VTEB ranks 1st and CMF 8th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
CMF vs VTEB
VTEB −0.05pt a year
0.08%0.03%
VTEB 12.2×the volume
1.41M17.2M
VTEB +0.3pt
+1.6%+1.9%
CMF vs VTEB Performance
+2.1%+3.1%
- CMF 0.08%
- VTEB 0.03%, better
- CMF $5.38B
- VTEB $52.4B
- CMF −0.1%
- VTEB +0.1%, better
- CMF 3.02%
- VTEB 3.47%, better
- CMF 1898
- VTEB 11156
- CMF 1.41M sh
- VTEB 17.2M sh, better
- CMF $55.66
- VTEB $48.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMF | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C45 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A92 | A95Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. CMF and VTEB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMFA
VTEBA
In short
CMF The California-only corner of the muni market, indexed since 2007 and priced at 0.08%. CMF holds bonds issued by California and its municipalities, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly.
VTEB Vanguard's national muni index fund, running since 2015 at three basis points, a tenth of what the typical muni ETF charges. Its benchmark screens for investment-grade bonds whose income is exempt from federal tax and the AMT.
Stated mandate
CMF The Fund seeks to track an index of California municipal bonds. It uses representative sampling and generally invests in municipal securities issued by California and its municipalities.
VTEB VTEB seeks to track an index measuring the investment-grade segment of the U.S. municipal bond market. It uses passive sampling to approximate the index and generally invests in federally tax-exempt municipal securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMF vs VTEB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMF vs VTEB Cost
Overpaying CMF vs VTEB
$1,051
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMF 0.08%
$1,689
VTEB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMF | VTEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $55 | $92 |
| 20 | $575 | $216 | $359 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $638 | $1,051 |
- 0.08%CMF
- 0.03%VTEB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VTEB cheapest of 63 funds
CMF 6th cheapest of 63 funds
CMF vs VTEB Dividends
- CMF 3.02%
- VTEB 3.47%, better
- CMF $1.69
- VTEB $1.70
- CMF $0.14
- VTEB $0.14
- CMF Oct 1, 2026
- VTEB Oct 1, 2026
- CMF Oct 6, 2026
- VTEB Oct 5, 2026
- CMF Monthly
- VTEB Monthly
Distribution history
CMF vs VTEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CMF
- VTEB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMF 5.6%, betterVTEB 5.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- CMF −0.07VTEB −0.004, better
- Worst fall
- CMF −12.2%, betterVTEB −12.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CMF 0.94VTEB 0.95
CMF and VTEB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




