VCRM ranks 4th and CMF 8th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
CMF vs VCRM
CMF −0.04pt a year
0.08%0.12%
CMF 2.1×the volume
1.41M679K
CMF vs VCRM Performance
−0.1%+1.1%
- CMF 0.08%, better
- VCRM 0.12%
- CMF $5.38B
- VCRM $2.2B
- CMF −0.1%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- CMF 3.02%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- CMF 1898
- VCRM 2588
- CMF 1.41M sh, better
- VCRM 679K sh
- CMF $55.66
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMF | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A89 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C45 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | A74 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. CMF and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMFA
VCRMA
In short
CMF The California-only corner of the muni market, indexed since 2007 and priced at 0.08%. CMF holds bonds issued by California and its municipalities, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
CMF The Fund seeks to track an index of California municipal bonds. It uses representative sampling and generally invests in municipal securities issued by California and its municipalities.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMF vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMF vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying VCRM vs CMF
$831
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMF 0.08%
$1,689
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMF | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $220 | $73 |
| 20 | $575 | $859 | $284 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $2,520 | $831 |
- 0.08%CMF, cheaper
- 0.12%VCRM
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
CMF 6th cheapest of 63 funds
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
CMF vs VCRM Dividends
- CMF 3.02%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- CMF $1.69
- VCRM $2.82
- CMF $0.14
- VCRM $0.21
- CMF Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- CMF Oct 6, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- CMF Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
CMF vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMF 5.6%VCRM 5.6%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- CMF −0.07VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- CMF −12.2%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CMF 0.94VCRM 0.17
CMF and VCRM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




