Skip to content
etf.net

COHC vs PANG

Corgi COHR 2x Daily ETF

COHCCCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

PANGANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

COHC −0.31pt a year

COHC0.45%PANG0.76%

Avg volume · 30D

PANG 9.7×the volume

COHC4.62KPANG44.6K

COHC vs PANG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−53.2%COHC+7.0%PANG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. COHC −53.2%. PANG +7.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%25%50%75%100%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
COHC 0.45%, better
PANG 0.76%
Fund size
COHC $0
PANG $9M
1Y total return
COHC No data
PANG +91.6%
Holdings
COHC 1
PANG 4
Avg volume (30D)
COHC 4.62K sh
PANG 44.6K sh, better
NAV per share
COHC $6.76
PANG $31.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COHC: Cost 88, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 15, Holdings not scored, Durability 19. PANG: Cost 70, Risk 74, Mission 94, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for COHC, PANG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOHCPANG
Cost30% weightA88HigherA70
Mission25% weightNot scoredA94
Risk15% weightD38A74Higher
Tradability15% weightF15A74Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF19B59Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COHC and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

PANG ranks 3rd and COHC 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3APANGLeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 5BAMDGLeverage Shares 2x Long AMD Daily ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 123CCIRCorgi CRCL 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 123CCOHCCorgi COHR 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  8. Rank 123CCRDCorgi CRDO 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COHCCCorgi COHR 2x Daily ETF

PANGALeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

In short

COHC No data

PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

COHC No data

PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.

Why people hold it

COHC No data

  • PANG Cheaper of the two 2x PANW funds: 0.76% flat versus 1.08% for PALU, and PALU's number is net of a waiver through September 1, 2027 (1.48% gross).direxion.com
  • That 0.76% also sits below the typical fee in the single-stock leveraged category, where costs usually run higher.
  • Hits its 200% daily target closely, one of the tighter implementations among hundreds of single-stock leveraged funds.
  • Leverage arrives inside a standard 1940 Act ETF: no margin agreement, no borrowing, no overnight position to roll yourself.leverageshares.com

Worth knowing

COHC No data

  • PANG Daily reset, not a 2x hold. Over weeks the returns compound, and a choppy stretch in PANW can leave the result far from double the move.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, twice the swing. An earnings miss or a cyber headline lands here with double the force, up or down.leverageshares.com
  • Smaller and more lightly traded than the giants of the category, so spreads can widen; limit orders earn their keep.

Full COHC profile⁠

Full PANG profile⁠

COHC vs PANG Holdings

How COHC and PANG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of COHC and 0.0% of PANG.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for COHC and PANG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in COHC and PANG, widest gap first
CountryMore in COHCMore in PANG
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • COHC195.8%
  • PANG208.4%

Securities held

  • COHC0
  • PANG1

Asset class

COHC
Equity
PANG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in COHC0
  • In both0
  • Only in PANG1

Only in COHC

0 securities, 0.0% of COHC by weight

Only in PANG

1 security, 8.4% of PANG by weight

  • First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.43%

Weight gaps

COHC and PANG share no securities.

All 1 COHC holdings⁠All 4 PANG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COHC vs PANG Cost

Overpaying PANG vs COHC

$5,615

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COHC 0.45%

    $9,041

  • PANG 0.76%

    $14,656

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COHC 0.45%
  • PANG 0.76%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PANG $14,656COHC $9,041

Year by year

YearCOHCPANGOverpaying
10$812$1,353$541
20$3,128$5,142$2,014
30$9,041$14,656$5,615

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%COHC, cheaper
  • 0.76%PANG
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

COHC 7th cheapest of 315 funds

PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds

COHC vs PANG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
COHC None
PANG No data
Last payment
COHC No data
PANG $1.30
Ex-dividend
COHC No data
PANG Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
COHC No data
PANG Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
COHC No data
PANG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

COHCAll COHC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PANGIrregular · 1 paymentAll PANG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

COHC vs PANG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COHC No dataPANG 128.2%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COHC No dataPANG 0.90since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COHC No dataPANG −62.4%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COHC 0.00PANG 3.32

Popular comparisons

  • COHCCvsTSMGA

    Corgi COHR 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • COHCCvsUNHGA

    Corgi COHR 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • COHCCvsOKTGA

    Corgi COHR 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.