TSDD ranks 2nd and CORD 38th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
CORD vs TSDD
0.0%by weight
TSDD −0.52pt a year
1.50%0.98%
CORD 1.05×the volume
11.5M11M
CORD vs TSDD Performance
−70.2%−24.7%
- CORD 1.50%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- CORD $30M
- TSDD $31M
- CORD −70.2%
- TSDD −24.7%, better
- CORD
- TSDD 10.55%
- CORD 2
- TSDD 1
- CORD 11.5M sh, better
- TSDD 11M sh
- CORD $4.77
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CORD | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D37 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B60 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. CORD and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CORDD
TSDDA
In short
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CORD vs TSDD Holdings
How CORD and TSDD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CORD and 0.0% of TSDD.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CORD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CORDMore in TSDD | CORD | TSDD |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CORD300.2%
- TSDD199.9%
- CORD1
- TSDD1
Asset class
- CORD
- Equity
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in CORD1
- In both0
- Only in TSDD1
Only in CORD
1 security, 4.9% of CORD by weight
- First American Government Obli First Am Gov Oblig X4.87%
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla199.89%
Weight gaps
CORD and TSDD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CORD vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying CORD vs TSDD
$7,921
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CORD 1.50%
$26,283
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CORD | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,729 | $861 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $6,504 | $3,015 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $18,362 | $7,921 |
- 1.50%CORD
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
CORD 35th cheapest of 43 funds
CORD vs TSDD Dividends
- CORD
- TSDD 10.55%
- CORD None
- TSDD $0.65
- CORD
- TSDD $0.65
- CORD
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- CORD
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- CORD
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
CORD vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CORD 228.7%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CORD 0.23TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- CORD −96.3%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CORD −4.63TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.