TSDD ranks 2nd and AMZD 5th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs TSDD
0.0%by weight
TSDD −0.04pt a year
1.02%0.98%
AMZD 1.1×the volume
12.2M11M
AMZD +54.8pt
−20.5%−75.3%
AMZD vs TSDD Performance
−3.4%−24.7%
- AMZD 1.02%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- AMZD $19M
- TSDD $31M
- AMZD −3.4%, better
- TSDD −24.7%
- AMZD 2.65%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- AMZD 3
- TSDD 1
- AMZD 12.2M sh, better
- TSDD 11M sh
- AMZD $8.90
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A96 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A72 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | A72 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
TSDDA
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs TSDD Holdings
How AMZD and TSDD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMZD and 0.0% of TSDD.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AMZD.
Concentration
- AMZD547.9%
- TSDD199.9%
- AMZD0
- TSDD1
Asset class
- AMZD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AMZD0
- In both0
- Only in TSDD1
Only in AMZD
0 securities, 0.0% of AMZD by weight
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla199.89%
Weight gaps
AMZD and TSDD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying AMZD vs TSDD
$650
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,729 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $6,504 | $242 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $18,362 | $650 |
- 1.02%AMZD
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs TSDD Dividends
- AMZD 2.65%
- TSDD 10.55%, better
- AMZD $0.24
- TSDD $0.65
- AMZD $0.05
- TSDD $0.65
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- AMZD Quarterly
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
AMZD vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%, betterTSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86, betterTSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.26TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.