COTG ranks 3rd and FBL 34th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs FBL
COTG −0.28pt a year
0.77%1.05%
FBL 11.2×the volume
97.2K1.08M
COTG vs FBL Performance
+16.3%−18.0%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- FBL 1.05%
- COTG $9M
- FBL $140M
- COTG +16.3%, better
- FBL −18.0%
- COTG
- FBL 2.79%
- COTG 4
- FBL 2
- COTG 97.2K sh
- FBL 1.08M sh, better
- COTG $15.32
- FBL $21.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | FBL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A95 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A86Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A77 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | A83Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and FBL are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
FBLB
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
FBL Two US ETFs offer 2x daily Meta exposure, and FBL has been doing it since 2022. One stock, one lever, reset every day: it aims for twice Meta's daily move before fees, and nothing else.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
FBL The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Meta Platforms Inc. before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs FBL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs FBL Cost
Overpaying FBL vs COTG
$4,666
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
FBL 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | FBL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,847 | $476 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $6,927 | $1,722 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $19,495 | $4,666 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 1.05%FBL
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
FBL 201st cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs FBL Dividends
- COTG
- FBL 2.79%
- COTG None
- FBL $0.67
- COTG
- FBL $0.67
- COTG
- FBL Dec 29, 2025
- COTG
- FBL Dec 31, 2025
- COTG
- FBL Irregular
Distribution history
COTG vs FBL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%FBL 73.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12FBL 0.55
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%FBL −63.2%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04FBL 2.70
COTG and FBL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
