COTG ranks 3rd and FGRU 297th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs FGRU
COTG −0.73pt a year
0.77%1.50%
COTG 1.3×the volume
97.2K75.5K
COTG vs FGRU Performance
+22.2%−42.0%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- FGRU 1.50%
- COTG $9M
- FGRU $6M
- COTG +16.3%
- FGRU
- COTG 4
- FGRU 2
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- FGRU 75.5K sh
- COTG $15.32
- FGRU $4.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | FGRU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | F12 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and FGRU are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
FGRUD
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs FGRU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs FGRU Cost
Overpaying FGRU vs COTG
$11,454
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
FGRU 1.50%
$26,283
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | FGRU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $2,590 | $1,219 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $9,519 | $4,314 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $26,283 | $11,454 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 1.50%FGRU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
FGRU 271st cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs FGRU Dividends
- COTG None
- FGRU None
Distribution history
COTG vs FGRU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%FGRU
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12FGRU
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%FGRU
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04FGRU −1.35
COTG and FGRU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
