COTG ranks 3rd and FNG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs FNG
COTG −0.22pt a year
0.77%0.99%
FNG 1.3×the volume
97.2K126K
COTG vs FNG Performance
+22.2%−68.1%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- FNG 0.99%
- COTG $9M
- FNG $3M
- COTG +16.3%
- FNG
- COTG 4
- FNG 3
- COTG 97.2K sh
- FNG 126K sh, better
- COTG $15.32
- FNG $2.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | FNG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | D39 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and FNG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
FNGC
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
FNG Single-stock leverage usually aims at mega-caps. FNG points at Fabrinet, the optical-packaging specialist that assembles fiber-optic gear for data centers, and targets 2x its daily move. A trading tool, reset every session.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
FNG The fund seeks daily returns, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of FN.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs FNG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs FNG Cost
Overpaying FNG vs COTG
$3,696
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
FNG 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | FNG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,746 | $375 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $6,565 | $1,360 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $18,525 | $3,696 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 0.99%FNG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
FNG 169th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs FNG Dividends
- COTG None
- FNG None
Distribution history
COTG vs FNG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%FNG
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12FNG
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%FNG
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04FNG −1.55
COTG and FNG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
