COTG ranks 3rd and ORCX 103rd of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs ORCX
COTG −0.54pt a year
0.77%1.31%
ORCX 28.9×the volume
97.2K2.81M
COTG vs ORCX Performance
+16.3%−84.3%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- ORCX 1.31%
- COTG $9M
- ORCX $143M
- COTG +16.3%, better
- ORCX −84.3%
- COTG 4
- ORCX 9
- COTG 97.2K sh
- ORCX 2.81M sh, better
- COTG $15.32
- ORCX $12.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | ORCX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | D26 |
| Mission | A95 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A86Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | A76 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | A81Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and ORCX are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
ORCXC
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
ORCX The first 2x ETF on Oracle, live since February 2025. It targets twice ORCL's daily move for 1.31%, pricier than most single-stock leverage, in a fund you can trade without a margin account.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
ORCX The Fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in Oracle Corporation's share price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs ORCX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs ORCX Cost
Overpaying ORCX vs COTG
$8,690
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
ORCX 1.31%
$23,519
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | ORCX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $2,280 | $909 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $8,450 | $3,245 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $23,519 | $8,690 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 1.31%ORCX
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
ORCX 236th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs ORCX Dividends
- COTG None
- ORCX None
Distribution history
COTG vs ORCX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%ORCX 131.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12ORCX 0.01
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%ORCX −92.8%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04ORCX 6.17
COTG and ORCX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
