COTG ranks 3rd and RIVC 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs RIVC
0.0%by weight
RIVC −0.32pt a year
0.77%0.45%
COTG 72.7×the volume
97.2K1.34K
COTG vs RIVC Performance
+22.2%−29.0%
- COTG 0.77%
- RIVC 0.45%, better
- COTG $9M
- RIVC $0
- COTG +16.3%
- RIVC
- COTG 4
- RIVC 1
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- RIVC 1.34K sh
- COTG $15.32
- RIVC $13.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | RIVC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | F19 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and RIVC are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
RIVCC
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs RIVC Holdings
How COTG and RIVC differ
0.0%
About this figure: COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
RIVC gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for COTG and RIVC.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in COTGMore in RIVC | Gap | COTG | RIVC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- COTG212.3%
- RIVC199.1%
- COTG1
- RIVC0
Asset class
- COTG
- Stocks
- RIVC
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in COTG1
- In both0
- Only in RIVC0
Only in COTG
1 security, 12.4% of COTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.36%
Only in RIVC
0 securities, 0.0% of RIVC by weight
Weight gaps
COTG and RIVC share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs RIVC Cost
Overpaying COTG vs RIVC
$5,788
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
RIVC 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | RIVC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $812 | $559 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $3,128 | $2,077 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $9,041 | $5,788 |
- 0.77%COTG
- 0.45%RIVC, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
RIVC 7th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs RIVC Dividends
- COTG None
- RIVC None
Distribution history
COTG vs RIVC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%RIVC
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12RIVC
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%RIVC
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04RIVC 0.00
COTG and RIVC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
