COTG ranks 3rd and RVNL 81st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs RVNL
COTG −0.45pt a year
0.77%1.22%
RVNL 1.1×the volume
97.2K109K
COTG vs RVNL Performance
+16.3%−52.6%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- RVNL 1.22%
- COTG $9M
- RVNL $14M
- COTG +16.3%, better
- RVNL −52.6%
- COTG 4
- RVNL 2
- COTG 97.2K sh
- RVNL 109K sh, better
- COTG $15.32
- RVNL $16.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A95 | A95 |
| Risk | A86Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | A70Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and RVNL are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
RVNLC
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
RVNL One lever, one stock: RVNL aims to deliver 2x Rivian's daily move, reset every trading day. The fee is 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026, against a 7.90% gross.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
RVNL The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily percentage change of Rivian Automotive Inc. It is not designed to deliver twice the cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs RVNL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs RVNL Cost
Overpaying RVNL vs COTG
$7,329
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
RVNL 1.22%
$22,158
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | RVNL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $2,131 | $760 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $7,931 | $2,726 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $22,158 | $7,329 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 1.22%RVNL
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
RVNL 227th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs RVNL Dividends
- COTG None
- RVNL None
Distribution history
COTG vs RVNL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%RVNL 77.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12RVNL −0.50
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%RVNL −83.6%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04RVNL 0.73
COTG and RVNL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.22% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.22% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.22% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
