COTG ranks 3rd and SOFC 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs SOFC
0.0%by weight
SOFC −0.32pt a year
0.77%0.45%
COTG 87.5×the volume
97.2K1.11K
COTG vs SOFC Performance
+22.2%−24.1%
- COTG 0.77%
- SOFC 0.45%, better
- COTG $9M
- SOFC $0
- COTG +16.3%
- SOFC
- COTG 4
- SOFC 1
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- SOFC 1.11K sh
- COTG $15.32
- SOFC $16.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | SOFC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | F17 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and SOFC are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
SOFCC
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs SOFC Holdings
How COTG and SOFC differ
0.0%
About this figure: COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
SOFC gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for COTG and SOFC.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in COTGMore in SOFC | Gap | COTG | SOFC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- COTG212.3%
- SOFC198.9%
- COTG1
- SOFC0
Asset class
- COTG
- Stocks
- SOFC
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in COTG1
- In both0
- Only in SOFC0
Only in COTG
1 security, 12.4% of COTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.36%
Only in SOFC
0 securities, 0.0% of SOFC by weight
Weight gaps
COTG and SOFC share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs SOFC Cost
Overpaying COTG vs SOFC
$5,788
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
SOFC 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | SOFC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $812 | $559 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $3,128 | $2,077 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $9,041 | $5,788 |
- 0.77%COTG
- 0.45%SOFC, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
SOFC 7th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs SOFC Dividends
- COTG None
- SOFC None
Distribution history
COTG vs SOFC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%SOFC
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12SOFC
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%SOFC
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04SOFC 6.04
COTG and SOFC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
