COTG ranks 3rd and TERG 26th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs TERG
1.0%by weight
TERG −0.02pt a year
0.77%0.75%
COTG 2.3×the volume
97.2K42.7K
COTG vs TERG Performance
+35.9%−21.9%
- COTG 0.77%
- TERG 0.75%, better
- COTG $9M
- TERG $5M
- COTG +16.3%
- TERG
- COTG 4
- TERG 6
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- TERG 42.7K sh
- COTG $15.32
- TERG $11.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | TERG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A93 |
| Risk | A86Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | C50 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and TERG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
TERGB
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
TERG Two times Teradyne's daily move in one ticker. TERG prices at 0.75%, under the norm for single-stock leverage, and it resets exposure every day, which makes it a short-horizon instrument by design.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
TERG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Teradyne, Inc. stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs TERG Holdings
How COTG and TERG differ
1.0%
Shared holdings make up 12.4% of COTG and 1.0% of TERG.
About this figure: COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
TERG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings1.0%
Sector
No Sector split for COTG and TERG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in COTGMore in TERG | Gap | COTG | TERG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- COTG212.3%
- TERG201.0%
- COTG1
- TERG1
Asset class
- COTG
- Stocks
- TERG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in COTG0
- In both1
- Only in TERG0
Only in COTG
0 securities, 0.0% of COTG by weight
Only in TERG
0 securities, 0.0% of TERG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in COTGMore in TERG | Gap | COTG | TERG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | COTG +11.32 points | 12.36% | 1.04% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs TERG Cost
Overpaying COTG vs TERG
$347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
TERG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | TERG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,336 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $5,078 | $127 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $14,482 | $347 |
- 0.77%COTG
- 0.75%TERG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TERG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs TERG Dividends
- COTG None
- TERG None
Distribution history
COTG vs TERG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%TERG
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12TERG
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%TERG
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04TERG 1.10
COTG and TERG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
