COTG ranks 3rd and UNHU 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs UNHU
COTG −0.20pt a year
0.77%0.97%
COTG 17.9×the volume
97.2K5.44K
COTG vs UNHU Performance
+22.2%−7.4%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- UNHU 0.97%
- COTG $9M
- UNHU $4M
- COTG +16.3%
- UNHU
- COTG 4
- UNHU 8
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- UNHU 5.44K sh
- COTG $15.32
- UNHU $47.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | UNHU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | B56 |
| Mission | A95Higher | A78 |
| Risk | A86 | A96Higher |
| Tradability | A77Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | B55 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and UNHU are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
UNHUC
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
UNHU Two ETFs chase 2x a daily move in UnitedHealth; this is Direxion's. It targets 200% of UNH's daily return and resets each night. Fee: 0.97% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027, 0.99% gross.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
UNHU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs UNHU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs UNHU Cost
Overpaying UNHU vs COTG
$3,369
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
UNHU 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | UNHU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,712 | $341 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $6,443 | $1,238 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $18,198 | $3,369 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 0.97%UNHU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
UNHU 156th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs UNHU Dividends
- COTG None
- UNHU
- COTG
- UNHU $0.25
- COTG
- UNHU Sep 22, 2026
- COTG
- UNHU Sep 29, 2026
- COTG
- UNHU Quarterly
Distribution history
COTG vs UNHU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%UNHU
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12UNHU
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%UNHU
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04UNHU 6.38
COTG and UNHU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
