VUG ranks 5th and COWG 22nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
COWG vs VUG
VUG −0.46pt a year
0.49%0.03%
VUG 24.7×the volume
256K6.32M
COWG +0.1pt
+24.7%+24.6%
COWG vs VUG Performance
+8.5%+2.7%
- COWG 0.49%
- VUG 0.03%, better
- COWG $2.3B
- VUG $392B
- COWG +8.5%, better
- VUG +2.7%
- COWG 0.75%, better
- VUG 0.41%
- COWG 101
- VUG 136
- COWG 256K sh
- VUG 6.32M sh, better
- COWG $39.39
- VUG $85.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COWG | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A99Higher |
| Risk | B57Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | D29 |
| Durability | C50 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. COWG and VUG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COWGB
VUGA
In short
COWG Pacer aimed its Cash Cows free-cash-flow playbook at growth stocks: roughly 100 Russell 1000 names chosen on cash generation and profitability rather than revenue growth alone. Growth, with the cash burners screened out.
VUG Three basis points buys roughly 170 US large-cap growth names. Running since 2004, over $100 billion in assets, and it tracks its index about as closely as an index fund can.
Stated mandate
COWG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Its rules-based strategy selects growth companies from the Russell 1000 using free cash flow margin and related profitability screens.
VUG The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of large-capitalization growth stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COWG vs VUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COWG vs VUG Cost
Overpaying COWG vs VUG
$9,154
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COWG 0.49%
$9,792
VUG 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COWG | VUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $55 | $828 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $216 | $3,178 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $638 | $9,154 |
- 0.49%COWG
- 0.03%VUG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
VUG cheapest of 35 funds
COWG 28th cheapest of 35 funds
COWG vs VUG Dividends
- COWG 0.75%, better
- VUG 0.41%
- COWG $0.30
- VUG $0.35
- COWG $0.19
- VUG $0.09
- COWG Sep 3, 2026
- VUG Sep 28, 2026
- COWG Sep 8, 2026
- VUG Sep 30, 2026
- COWG Quarterly
- VUG Quarterly
Distribution history
COWG vs VUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COWG 16.0%, betterVUG 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- COWG 1.19, betterVUG 1.11
- Worst fall
- COWG −23.6%VUG −35.6%
- Market sensitivity
- COWG 1.04VUG 1.23
COWG and VUG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


