SCHG ranks 2nd and COWG 22nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
COWG vs SCHG
SCHG −0.45pt a year
0.49%0.04%
SCHG 29.7×the volume
256K7.59M
SCHG +0.1pt
+24.7%+24.8%
COWG vs SCHG Performance
+8.5%+3.3%
- COWG 0.49%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- COWG $2.3B
- SCHG $61.7B
- COWG +8.5%, better
- SCHG +3.3%
- COWG 0.75%, better
- SCHG 0.40%
- COWG 101
- SCHG 187
- COWG 256K sh
- SCHG 7.59M sh, better
- COWG $39.39
- SCHG $34.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COWG | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A92 |
| Risk | B57Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | B66 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | B65Higher | D36 |
| Durability | C50 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. COWG and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COWGB
SCHGA
In short
COWG Pacer aimed its Cash Cows free-cash-flow playbook at growth stocks: roughly 100 Russell 1000 names chosen on cash generation and profitability rather than revenue growth alone. Growth, with the cash burners screened out.
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
Stated mandate
COWG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Its rules-based strategy selects growth companies from the Russell 1000 using free cash flow margin and related profitability screens.
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COWG vs SCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COWG vs SCHG Cost
Overpaying COWG vs SCHG
$8,943
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COWG 0.49%
$9,792
SCHG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COWG | SCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $73 | $810 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $288 | $3,106 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $849 | $8,943 |
- 0.49%COWG
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
COWG 28th cheapest of 35 funds
COWG vs SCHG Dividends
- COWG 0.75%, better
- SCHG 0.40%
- COWG $0.30
- SCHG $0.14
- COWG $0.19
- SCHG $0.04
- COWG Sep 3, 2026
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- COWG Sep 8, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- COWG Quarterly
- SCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
COWG vs SCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COWG 16.0%, betterSCHG 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- COWG 1.19, betterSCHG 1.16
- Worst fall
- COWG −23.6%SCHG −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- COWG 1.04SCHG 1.20
COWG and SCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

