Skip to content

COWG vs SCHG

Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

COWGBNasdaq

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

SCHGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHG −0.45pt a year

COWG0.49%SCHG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHG 29.7×the volume

COWG256KSCHG7.59M

3Y return · a year

SCHG +0.1pt

COWG+24.7%SCHG+24.8%

COWG vs SCHG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.5%COWG+3.3%SCHG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. COWG +8.5%. SCHG +3.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
COWG 0.49%
SCHG 0.04%, better
Fund size
COWG $2.3B
SCHG $61.7B
1Y total return
COWG +8.5%, better
SCHG +3.3%
Yield (12M)
COWG 0.75%, better
SCHG 0.40%
Holdings
COWG 101
SCHG 187
Avg volume (30D)
COWG 256K sh
SCHG 7.59M sh, better
NAV per share
COWG $39.39
SCHG $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COWG: Cost 18, Risk 57, Mission 92, Tradability 66, Holdings 65, Durability 50. SCHG: Cost 96, Risk 41, Mission 92, Tradability 87, Holdings 36, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for COWG, SCHG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOWGSCHG
Cost30% weightF18A96Higher
Mission25% weightA92A92
Risk15% weightB57HigherC41
Tradability15% weightB66A87Higher
Holdings10% weightB65HigherD36
Durability5% weightC50A75Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COWG and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

SCHG ranks 2nd and COWG 22nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 5AVUGVanguard Morningstar Growth ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 19BSNPGXtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETFScore 59
  7. Rank 22BCOWGPacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETFScore 55
  8. Rank 23CRPGInvesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COWGBPacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

SCHGASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

In short

COWG Pacer aimed its Cash Cows free-cash-flow playbook at growth stocks: roughly 100 Russell 1000 names chosen on cash generation and profitability rather than revenue growth alone. Growth, with the cash burners screened out.

SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.

Stated mandate

COWG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Its rules-based strategy selects growth companies from the Russell 1000 using free cash flow margin and related profitability screens.

SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.

Why people hold it

  • COWG The screen is the product: Russell 1000 growth companies ranked on free cash flow margin and related profitability tests, and the fund has tracked that index closely.paceretfs.com
  • About 100 holdings, so the cash flow filter actually shows up in the portfolio instead of being diluted across a several-hundred-name growth benchmark.
  • Has reached multi-billion-dollar scale since its 2022 launch, trades at moderate volume, and pays on a quarterly schedule.
  • SCHG 0.04% a year against a growth-category median of 0.18%. Costs sit near the floor of the group.
  • Hews closely to the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, one of the tighter index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2009, a multi-billion-dollar fund, and one of the busier tickers in the growth aisle, so entering and exiting is usually cheap and easy.
  • The benchmark is carved out of a total-market growth index, not S&P 500 membership, so a stock does not need an index committee's nod to qualify.

Worth knowing

  • COWG The screen is not cheap: 0.49% a year against a growth-cohort median of 0.18%, and multiples of plain index rivals like VUG (0.03%) or SCHG (0.04%).
  • Short history. It launched in December 2022, so there is no full-cycle record behind the methodology yet.
  • A concentrated rules-based slice can look quite different from a standard large-cap growth index between rebalances, in either direction.
  • SCHG Growth-only by design. Value and dividend-heavy corners of the market sit outside the mandate, so the ride differs from a total-market fund.
  • Large-cap U.S. only, roughly 200 stocks. No mid-caps, no small-caps, nothing overseas.
  • VUG charges a hair less for a similar broad-growth mandate. A tiny gap, but it is there. Distributions here arrive quarterly.

Full COWG profile⁠

Full SCHG profile⁠

COWG vs SCHG Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COWG vs SCHG Cost

Overpaying COWG vs SCHG

$8,943

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COWG 0.49%

    $9,792

  • SCHG 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COWG 0.49%
  • SCHG 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530COWG $9,792SCHG $849

Year by year

YearCOWGSCHGOverpaying
10$883$73$810
20$3,394$288$3,106
30$9,792$849$8,943

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%COWG
  • 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds

COWG 28th cheapest of 35 funds

COWG vs SCHG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
COWG 0.75%, better
SCHG 0.40%
Payout (12M)
COWG $0.30
SCHG $0.14
Last payment
COWG $0.19
SCHG $0.04
Ex-dividend
COWG Sep 3, 2026
SCHG Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
COWG Sep 8, 2026
SCHG Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
COWG Quarterly
SCHG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

COWGQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll COWG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2023 $0.02; Jun 22, 2023 $0.02; Sep 21, 2023 $0.02; Dec 27, 2023 $0.04; Mar 21, 2024 $0.03; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Sep 26, 2024 $0.03; Dec 27, 2024 $0.05; Mar 6, 2025 $0.0049; Jun 5, 2025 $0.0082; Sep 4, 2025 $0.04; Dec 30, 2025 $0.06; Mar 5, 2026 $0.01; Jun 4, 2026 $0.03; Sep 3, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
SCHGQuarterly · 42 paymentsAll SCHG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 42 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.02; Jun 19, 2017 $0.02; Sep 18, 2017 $0.03; Dec 18, 2017 $0.02; Mar 16, 2018 $0.02; Jun 26, 2018 $0.02; Sep 25, 2018 $0.02; Dec 12, 2018 $0.03; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 26, 2019 $0.03; Sep 25, 2019 $0.03; Dec 12, 2019 $0.02; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.02; Dec 10, 2020 $0.02; Mar 24, 2021 $0.02; Jun 23, 2021 $0.02; Sep 22, 2021 $0.02; Dec 8, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.0051; Mar 23, 2022 $0.02; Jun 22, 2022 $0.02; Sep 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 7, 2022 $0.02; Mar 22, 2023 $0.02; Jun 21, 2023 $0.02; Sep 20, 2023 $0.02; Dec 6, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0063; Mar 20, 2024 $0.02; Jun 26, 2024 $0.03; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 11, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.03; Jun 25, 2025 $0.03; Sep 24, 2025 $0.03; Dec 10, 2025 $0.03; Mar 25, 2026 $0.04; Jun 24, 2026 $0.03; Sep 23, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

COWG vs SCHG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COWG 16.0%, betterSCHG 16.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COWG 1.19, betterSCHG 1.16
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COWG −23.6%since Dec 2022SCHG −34.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COWG 1.04SCHG 1.20

COWG and SCHG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • COWGBvsSPYGA

    Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsSPYGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COWGBvsILCGA

    Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsILCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COWGBvsIMCGA

    Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsIMCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.