CPRY ranks 1st and KBUF 15th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
CPRY vs KBUF
0.0%by weight
CPRY −0.28pt a year
0.69%0.97%
CPRY 2.0×the volume
8.92K4.52K
CPRY vs KBUF Performance
+7.9%−20.0%
- CPRY 0.69%, better
- KBUF 0.97%
- CPRY $36M
- KBUF $6M
- CPRY +7.9%, better
- KBUF −20.0%
- CPRY
- KBUF 9.14%
- CPRY 3
- KBUF 3
- CPRY 8.92K sh, better
- KBUF 4.52K sh
- CPRY $28.40
- KBUF $25.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPRY | KBUF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F9 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A81Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | D38 | |
| Durability | B65Higher | B61 |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. CPRY and KBUF are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CPRYA
KBUFF
In short
CPRY Small caps with a hard floor. CPRY uses options to target 100% of your starting value back over a one-year outcome period, before fees. The trade: a ceiling on the upside, reset each January.
KBUF Buffer ETFs almost always wrap a US index. This one wraps KWEB, KraneShares' China internet basket, with a 90% protection level running to January 2027. A wild reference asset, put inside defined guardrails.
Stated mandate
CPRY The fund seeks point-to-point exposure to the positive price return of the Russell 2000 up to a defined cap, while providing 100% downside protection over the one-year outcome period before fees and expenses.
KBUF The fund seeks to track the price return of KWEB during a defined outcome period, subject to a 40.01% cap and a 90% downside buffer.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CPRY vs KBUF Holdings
How CPRY and KBUF differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CPRY and 0.0% of KBUF.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CPRY.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for CPRY.
Concentration
- CPRY108.9%
- KBUF100.0%
- CPRY0
- KBUF2
Asset class
- CPRY
- Equity
- KBUF
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CPRY0
- In both0
- Only in KBUF2
Only in CPRY
0 securities, 0.0% of CPRY by weight
Only in KBUF
2 securities, 100% of KBUF by weight
- KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF84.37%
- 2KWEB Us 01/15/27 P27.4915.60%
Weight gaps
CPRY and KBUF share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPRY vs KBUF Cost
Overpaying KBUF vs CPRY
$4,769
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPRY 0.69%
$13,429
KBUF 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPRY | KBUF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,712 | $480 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $6,443 | $1,746 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $18,198 | $4,769 |
- 0.69%CPRY, cheaper
- 0.97%KBUF
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
CPRY 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
KBUF 16th cheapest of 18 funds
CPRY vs KBUF Dividends
- CPRY
- KBUF 9.14%
- CPRY None
- KBUF $2.30
- CPRY
- KBUF $2.30
- CPRY
- KBUF Dec 30, 2025
- CPRY
- KBUF Dec 31, 2025
- CPRY
- KBUF Irregular
Distribution history
CPRY vs KBUF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPRY 2.9%KBUF 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CPRY 1.12KBUF 0.02
- Worst fall
- CPRY −3.2%KBUF −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CPRY 0.15KBUF 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.