ISWN ranks 3rd and KBUF 15th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
ISWN vs KBUF
ISWN −0.48pt a year
0.49%0.97%
KBUF 2.3×the volume
1.97K4.52K
ISWN vs KBUF Performance
+2.4%−20.0%
- ISWN 0.49%, better
- KBUF 0.97%
- ISWN $35M
- KBUF $6M
- ISWN +2.4%, better
- KBUF −20.0%
- ISWN 3.09%
- KBUF 9.14%, better
- ISWN 14
- KBUF 3
- ISWN 1.97K sh
- KBUF 4.52K sh, better
- ISWN $21.22
- KBUF $25.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ISWN | KBUF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F9 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D39Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B61 |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. ISWN and KBUF are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ISWNA
KBUFF
In short
ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.
KBUF Buffer ETFs almost always wrap a US index. This one wraps KWEB, KraneShares' China internet basket, with a 90% protection level running to January 2027. A wild reference asset, put inside defined guardrails.
Stated mandate
ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.
KBUF The fund seeks to track the price return of KWEB during a defined outcome period, subject to a 40.01% cap and a 90% downside buffer.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ISWN vs KBUF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ISWN vs KBUF Cost
Overpaying KBUF vs ISWN
$8,406
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ISWN 0.49%
$9,792
KBUF 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ISWN | KBUF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,712 | $829 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $6,443 | $3,049 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $18,198 | $8,406 |
- 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
- 0.97%KBUF
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
ISWN cheapest of 18 funds
KBUF 16th cheapest of 18 funds
ISWN vs KBUF Dividends
- ISWN 3.09%
- KBUF 9.14%, better
- ISWN $0.65
- KBUF $2.30
- ISWN $0.17
- KBUF $2.30
- ISWN Sep 29, 2026
- KBUF Dec 30, 2025
- ISWN Sep 30, 2026
- KBUF Dec 31, 2025
- ISWN Quarterly
- KBUF Irregular
Distribution history
ISWN vs KBUF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ISWN 12.1%KBUF 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ISWN 0.54KBUF 0.02
- Worst fall
- ISWN −31.7%KBUF −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ISWN 0.58KBUF 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.