CPSL ranks 1st and MAYC 22nd of 27 funds in the S&P 500 Full Protection Category.
CPSL vs MAYC
0.0%by weight
CPSL −0.20pt a year
0.10%0.30%
CPSL 21.9×the volume
37.4K1.71K
CPSL vs MAYC Performance
+1.2%+1.0%
- CPSL 0.10%, better
- MAYC 0.30%
- CPSL $163M
- MAYC $1M
- CPSL +5.3%
- MAYC
- CPSL 13
- MAYC 4
- CPSL 37.4K sh, better
- MAYC 1.71K sh
- CPSL $28.38
- MAYC $26.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPSL | MAYC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A91 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | F17 |
| Holdings | A93 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | F3 |
Rank among S&P 500 Full Protection funds
Same Category. CPSL and MAYC are both graded against the same 27 S&P 500 Full Protection funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CPSL vs MAYC Holdings
How CPSL and MAYC differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CPSL and 0.0% of MAYC.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CPSL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CPSLMore in MAYC | CPSL | MAYC |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | CPSL +0.5 points | 100.0% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | MAYC +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| China | MAYC +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | MAYC +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CPSL83.3%
- MAYC103.3%
- CPSL12
- MAYC3
Asset class
- CPSL
- Equity
- MAYC
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CPSL12
- In both0
- Only in MAYC3
Only in CPSL
12 securities, 99.9% of CPSL by weight
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October8.38%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - November8.36%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December8.36%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - January8.34%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February8.33%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August8.33%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March8.32%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April8.31%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July8.31%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September8.31%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May8.30%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June8.29%
Only in MAYC
3 securities, 100% of MAYC by weight
- Spy 04/30/2027 143.73 C88.52%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.5% 04/30/202710.83%
- Spy 04/30/2027 718.66 P2.84%
Weight gaps
CPSL and MAYC share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPSL vs MAYC Cost
Overpaying MAYC vs CPSL
$4,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPSL 0.10%
$2,106
MAYC 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPSL | MAYC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $545 | $362 |
| 20 | $717 | $2,113 | $1,396 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $6,149 | $4,043 |
- 0.10%CPSL, cheaper
- 0.30%MAYC
- Middle half of S&P 500 Full Protection funds
- Median 0.69%
CPSL cheapest of 27 funds
MAYC 2nd cheapest of 27 funds
CPSL vs MAYC Dividends
- CPSL None
- MAYC None
Distribution history
CPSL vs MAYC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPSL 2.3%MAYC
- Return per unit of risk
- CPSL 0.65MAYC
- Worst fall
- CPSL −3.7%MAYC
- Market sensitivity
- CPSL 0.17MAYC 0.48
CPSL and MAYC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

