Skip to content

CPTL vs VYM

Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF

CPTLCNasdaq

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VYM −0.31pt a year

CPTL0.35%VYM0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VYM 293.5×the volume

CPTL3.89KVYM1.14M

CPTL vs VYM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.7%CPTL+1.7%VYM

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CPTL +1.7%. VYM +1.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−2%0%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CPTL 0.35%
VYM 0.04%, better
Fund size
CPTL $112M
VYM $95.8B
1Y total return
CPTL No data
VYM +19.3%
Yield (12M)
CPTL 2.33%, better
VYM 2.24%
Holdings
CPTL 155
VYM 601
Avg volume (30D)
CPTL 3.89K sh
VYM 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
CPTL $48.81
VYM $163.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CPTL: Cost 42, Risk 82, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 35, Durability 44. VYM: Cost 99, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 61, Holdings 53, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for CPTL, VYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCPTLVYM
Cost30% weightC42A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightA82A84Higher
Tradability15% weightD31B61Higher
Holdings10% weightD35C53Higher
Durability5% weightC44A95Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CPTL and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VYM ranks 2nd and CPTL 72nd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 70CXMVMInvesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 72CCPTLGlobal X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 73CBLGRBluemonte Large Cap Growth ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CPTLCGlobal X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF

VYMAVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

In short

CPTL No data

VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.

Stated mandate

CPTL No data

VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.

Why people hold it

CPTL No data

  • VYM Four basis points a year, against a peer-group median near 0.32%. Cheaper than cohort neighbors VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Running since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so ordinary orders tend to fill at tight spreads.
  • Simple mandate: track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index of US common stocks screened on yield. No manager discretion, no options overlay, plain 1940-Act fund.vanguard.com
  • Pays quarterly, and among 100-plus value and multifactor rivals it stands as one of the strongest overall packages in the group.

Worth knowing

CPTL No data

  • VYM The screen is yield, not payout growth or dividend quality, so a company can qualify simply because its share price fell.
  • This is a value slice by design, tilted to established payers, so it behaves differently from a total US market fund.
  • Roughly 600 holdings, but weight leans toward the largest payers, so the top of the roster does more of the work than the count suggests.

Full CPTL profile⁠

Full VYM profile⁠

CPTL vs VYM Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CPTL vs VYM Cost

Overpaying CPTL vs VYM

$6,277

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CPTL 0.35%

    $7,126

  • VYM 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CPTL 0.35%
  • VYM 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CPTL $7,126VYM $849

Year by year

YearCPTLVYMOverpaying
10$634$73$561
20$2,454$288$2,166
30$7,126$849$6,277

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CPTL
  • 0.04%VYM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VYM cheapest of 99 funds

CPTL 56th cheapest of 99 funds

CPTL vs VYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CPTL 2.33%, better
VYM 2.24%
Payout (12M)
CPTL $1.14
VYM $3.68
Last payment
CPTL $0.17
VYM $0.89
Ex-dividend
CPTL Jun 29, 2026
VYM Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
CPTL Jul 2, 2026
VYM Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
CPTL Irregular
VYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CPTLIrregular · 16 paymentsAll CPTL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.24; Dec 28, 2018 $0.33; Dec 30, 2019 $0.19; Jun 29, 2020 $0.10; Dec 30, 2020 $0.16; Jun 29, 2021 $0.13; Dec 30, 2021 $0.25; Jun 29, 2022 $0.12; Dec 29, 2022 $0.12; Jun 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 28, 2023 $0.24; Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Dec 30, 2024 $0.21; Jun 27, 2025 $0.16; Dec 30, 2025 $0.97; Jun 29, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.60; Sep 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 21, 2017 $0.64; Mar 26, 2018 $0.61; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 26, 2018 $0.67; Dec 24, 2018 $0.74; Mar 25, 2019 $0.65; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Sep 24, 2019 $0.79; Dec 23, 2019 $0.78; Mar 10, 2020 $0.55; Jun 22, 2020 $0.84; Sep 21, 2020 $0.71; Dec 21, 2020 $0.81; Mar 22, 2021 $0.66; Jun 21, 2021 $0.75; Sep 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 20, 2021 $0.94; Mar 21, 2022 $0.66; Jun 21, 2022 $0.85; Sep 19, 2022 $0.77; Dec 19, 2022 $0.97; Mar 20, 2023 $0.72; Jun 20, 2023 $0.88; Sep 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $1.10; Mar 15, 2024 $0.66; Jun 21, 2024 $1.02; Sep 20, 2024 $0.85; Dec 20, 2024 $0.96; Mar 21, 2025 $0.85; Jun 20, 2025 $0.86; Sep 19, 2025 $0.84; Dec 19, 2025 $0.95; Mar 20, 2026 $0.86; Jun 18, 2026 $0.98; Sep 18, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

CPTL vs VYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CPTL No dataVYM 11.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CPTL No dataVYM 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CPTL No dataVYM −15.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CPTL 1.01VYM 0.75

CPTL and VYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CPTLCvsVONVA

    Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsVONVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPTLCvsILCVA

    Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsILCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPTLCvsIMCVA

    Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.