CRBN ranks 4th and DGT 6th of 6 funds in the MSCI ACWI / World Category.
CRBN vs DGT
CRBN −0.30pt a year
0.20%0.50%
DGT 1.6×the volume
8.05K12.7K
DGT +1.5pt
+12.4%+13.9%
CRBN vs DGT Performance
+57.8%+92.0%
- CRBN 0.20%, better
- DGT 0.50%
- CRBN $1.14B
- DGT $658M
- CRBN +12.8%
- DGT +20.4%, better
- CRBN 2.03%
- DGT 2.48%, better
- CRBN 1073
- DGT 173
- CRBN 8.05K sh
- DGT 12.7K sh, better
- CRBN $245.46
- DGT $186.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRBN | DGT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | F13 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C50 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | D29Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B57Higher | C44 |
Rank among MSCI ACWI / World funds
Same Category. CRBN and DGT are both graded against the same 6 MSCI ACWI / World funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRBNB
DGTC
In short
CRBN Keeps the whole world in the basket, then leans it away from carbon. CRBN tracks an MSCI ACWI index built for lower carbon exposure, with screens on thermal coal, oil sands and controversial weapons.
DGT Most global funds rank the world by market cap. DGT tracks the Global Dow: 150 blue chips chosen by a committee for their weight in the world economy, each held in equal size and reset to equal every September. A curated list, not a size ladder.
Stated mandate
CRBN The fund seeks to track global equities through an index designed to have lower carbon exposure than the broad market, while applying screens for controversial weapons, oil sands, and thermal coal mining.
DGT The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the Global Dow Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRBN vs DGT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRBN vs DGT Cost
Overpaying DGT vs CRBN
$5,824
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRBN 0.20%
$4,155
DGT 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRBN | DGT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $900 | $535 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $3,460 | $2,039 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $9,979 | $5,824 |
- 0.20%CRBN, cheaper
- 0.50%DGT
- Middle half of MSCI ACWI / World funds
- Median 0.26%
CRBN 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
DGT 6th cheapest of 6 funds
CRBN vs DGT Dividends
- CRBN 2.03%
- DGT 2.48%, better
- CRBN $5.11
- DGT $4.76
- CRBN $1.73
- DGT $0.48
- CRBN Jun 15, 2026
- DGT Sep 21, 2026
- CRBN Jun 18, 2026
- DGT Sep 23, 2026
- CRBN Twice a year
- DGT Quarterly
Distribution history
CRBN vs DGT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CRBN
- DGT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRBN 11.7%DGT 10.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CRBN 1.40DGT 1.74, better
- Worst fall
- CRBN −27.0%DGT −25.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CRBN 0.95DGT 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.