SPGM ranks 2nd and CRBN 3rd of 6 funds in the MSCI ACWI / World Category.
CRBN vs SPGM
SPGM −0.11pt a year
0.20%0.09%
SPGM 14.1×the volume
8.14K115K
CRBN +0.1pt
+12.5%+12.4%
CRBN vs SPGM Performance
+57.9%+60.9%
- CRBN 0.20%
- SPGM 0.09%, better
- CRBN $1.19B
- SPGM $1.8B
- CRBN +12.2%
- SPGM +13.9%, better
- CRBN 2.03%, better
- SPGM 1.81%
- CRBN 1067
- SPGM 2917
- CRBN 8.14K sh
- SPGM 115K sh, better
- CRBN $252.09
- SPGM $85.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRBN | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A73Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C51Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D35 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | A73Higher |
| Durability | B57Higher | C54 |
Rank among MSCI ACWI / World funds
Same Category. CRBN and SPGM are both graded against the same 6 MSCI ACWI / World funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRBNB
SPGMA
In short
CRBN Keeps the whole world in the basket, then leans it away from carbon. CRBN tracks an MSCI ACWI index built for lower carbon exposure, with screens on thermal coal, oil sands and controversial weapons.
SPGM One ticker for the whole investable world. SPGM tracks MSCI's ACWI IMI index, holding roughly 2,900 stocks across developed and emerging markets, and charges 0.09% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
CRBN The fund seeks to track global equities through an index designed to have lower carbon exposure than the broad market, while applying screens for controversial weapons, oil sands, and thermal coal mining.
SPGM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRBN vs SPGM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRBN vs SPGM Cost
Overpaying CRBN vs SPGM
$2,257
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRBN 0.20%
$4,155
SPGM 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRBN | SPGM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $165 | $200 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $646 | $775 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $1,898 | $2,257 |
- 0.20%CRBN
- 0.09%SPGM, cheaper
- Middle half of MSCI ACWI / World funds
- Median 0.26%
SPGM 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
CRBN 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
CRBN vs SPGM Dividends
- CRBN 2.03%, better
- SPGM 1.81%
- CRBN $5.11
- SPGM $1.54
- CRBN $1.73
- SPGM $0.67
- CRBN Jun 15, 2026
- SPGM Jun 1, 2026
- CRBN Jun 18, 2026
- SPGM Jun 5, 2026
- CRBN Twice a year
- SPGM Twice a year
Distribution history
CRBN vs SPGM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CRBN
- SPGM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRBN 11.7%SPGM 11.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CRBN 1.40SPGM 1.46, better
- Worst fall
- CRBN −27.0%SPGM −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CRBN 0.95SPGM 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.