PANG ranks 3rd and CRCA 62nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRCA vs PANG
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.19pt a year
0.95%0.76%
CRCA 23.1×the volume
1.03M44.6K
CRCA vs PANG Performance
−89.5%+76.3%
- CRCA 0.95%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- CRCA $75M
- PANG $9M
- CRCA −89.5%
- PANG +76.3%, better
- CRCA 6.28%
- PANG
- CRCA 1
- PANG 4
- CRCA 1.03M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- CRCA $12.77
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRCA | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | D31 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A77Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRCA and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRCAB
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRCA vs PANG Holdings
How CRCA and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CRCA and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CRCA and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CRCAMore in PANG | CRCA | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CRCA100.0%
- PANG210.1%
- CRCA0
- PANG1
Asset class
- CRCA
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CRCA0
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in CRCA
0 securities, 0.0% of CRCA by weight
Only in PANG
1 security, 10.0% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.04%
Weight gaps
CRCA and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRCA vs PANG Cost
Overpaying CRCA vs PANG
$3,213
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRCA 0.95%
$17,869
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRCA | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,353 | $325 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,142 | $1,180 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $14,656 | $3,213 |
- 0.95%CRCA
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CRCA 152nd cheapest of 315 funds
CRCA vs PANG Dividends
- CRCA 6.28%
- PANG
- CRCA $0.79
- PANG
- CRCA $0.13
- PANG $1.30
- CRCA Sep 23, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CRCA Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CRCA Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CRCA vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRCA 169.7%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRCA −0.37PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CRCA −95.5%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CRCA 1.32PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.