SCHZ ranks 2nd and CRDT 113th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
CRDT vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.94pt a year
0.97%0.03%
SCHZ 356.8×the volume
6.64K2.37M
SCHZ +4.9pt
+0.5%+5.4%
CRDT vs SCHZ Performance
−6.0%−0.2%
- CRDT 0.97%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- CRDT $27M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- CRDT −6.0%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- CRDT 6.49%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- CRDT 43
- SCHZ 12610
- CRDT 6.64K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- CRDT $20.65
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRDT | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | F21 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | F11 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | D31 | A78Higher |
| Durability | C40 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. CRDT and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRDTF
SCHZA
In short
CRDT Not an index bond fund. CRDT roams high yield, investment grade and distressed debt hunting income, run by an alternatives shop that also handles the hedging, and it pays monthly.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
CRDT CRDT seeks current income as its primary objective, with long-term capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRDT vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRDT vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying CRDT vs SCHZ
$17,560
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRDT 0.97%
$18,198
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRDT | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $55 | $1,657 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $216 | $6,227 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $638 | $17,560 |
- 0.97%CRDT
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
CRDT 113th cheapest of 114 funds
CRDT vs SCHZ Dividends
- CRDT 6.49%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- CRDT $1.34
- SCHZ $0.96
- CRDT $0.15
- SCHZ $0.08
- CRDT Oct 27, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- CRDT Oct 30, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- CRDT Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
CRDT vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRDT 7.9%SCHZ 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CRDT −0.47SCHZ 0.17, better
- Worst fall
- CRDT −15.6%SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CRDT 0.50SCHZ 0.99
CRDT and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
