Skip to content
etf.net

CRTC vs LOHA

Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF

CRTCBNYSE Arca

Roundhill HALO ETF

LOHABCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

CRTC0.35%LOHA0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

LOHA 1.2×the volume

CRTC25.4KLOHA31.1K

CRTC vs LOHA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.4%CRTC+1.8%LOHA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CRTC +3.4%. LOHA +1.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%5%7.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CRTC 0.35%
LOHA 0.35%
Fund size
CRTC $158M
LOHA $35M
1Y total return
CRTC +9.1%
LOHA No data
Yield (12M)
CRTC 0.95%
LOHA No data
Holdings
CRTC 208
LOHA 102
Avg volume (30D)
CRTC 25.4K sh
LOHA 31.1K sh, better
NAV per share
CRTC $40.32
LOHA $26.46
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CRTC: Cost 60, Risk 77, Mission 40, Tradability 45, Holdings 68, Durability 75. LOHA: Cost 60, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 92, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for CRTC, LOHA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCRTCLOHA
Cost30% weightB60B60
Mission25% weightC40Not scored
Risk15% weightA77A79Higher
Tradability15% weightC45C54Higher
Holdings10% weightB68A92Higher
Durability5% weightA75HigherC51

Rank among US Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CRTC and LOHA are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Thematic⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

LOHA ranks 3rd and CRTC 5th of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1ALRNDNYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BLOHARoundhill HALO ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BHOMZHoya Capital Housing ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BCRTCXtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 6CFDNFirst Trust Dow Jones Internet Index FundScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CRTCBXtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF

LOHABRoundhill HALO ETF

In short

CRTC Less a tech fund than a national-security screen. CRTC holds developed-market large and mid caps tied to the 14 critical technology areas the Pentagon defined, then filters them by how entangled each company is with adversarial nations.

LOHA No data

Stated mandate

CRTC The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index.

LOHA No data

Why people hold it

  • CRTC Two screens, not one: association with a DoD-defined critical technology area, then a geostrategic risk rating on each company's exposure to adversarial versus Five Eyes countries.dws.combusinesswire.com
  • The 14 areas run from biotechnology and quantum science to microelectronics and advanced materials, so the roughly 220 holdings reach well past software and chips.dws.com
  • Costs 0.35% a year against a 0.57% median for the US thematic funds we grade. Pays quarterly.
  • The portfolio closely matches the mandate in its prospectus, and it sits in the top quartile of its thematic peer group on our review.

LOHA No data

Worth knowing

  • CRTC Not the cheapest shelf in the aisle: peers LRND (0.14%) and TECB (0.30%) undercut it, though they screen for different things.
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund. The prospectus flags bid-ask spread costs, which tend to bite more in lightly traded names.dws.com
  • The security screen rests on J.H. Whitney's proprietary model and the index rebalances in May and November, so the roster can shift meaningfully at each reset.dws.com

LOHA No data

Full CRTC profile⁠

Full LOHA profile⁠

CRTC vs LOHA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CRTC vs LOHA Cost

Same expense ratio

$7,126

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CRTC 0.35%

    $7,126

  • LOHA 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CRTC 0.35%
  • LOHA 0.35%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CRTC $7,126LOHA $7,126

Year by year

YearCRTCLOHA
10$634$634
20$2,454$2,454
30$7,126$7,126

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CRTC
  • 0.35%LOHA
  • Middle half of US Thematic funds
  • Median 0.35%

CRTC 7th cheapest of 22 funds

LOHA 7th cheapest of 22 funds

CRTC vs LOHA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CRTC 0.95%
LOHA No data
Payout (12M)
CRTC $0.38
LOHA None
Last payment
CRTC $0.14
LOHA No data
Ex-dividend
CRTC Sep 18, 2026
LOHA No data
Paid on
CRTC Sep 25, 2026
LOHA No data
Frequency
CRTC Quarterly
LOHA No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CRTCQuarterly · 13 paymentsAll CRTC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2023 $0.04; Mar 15, 2024 $0.06; Jun 21, 2024 $0.08; Sep 20, 2024 $0.10; Dec 6, 2024 $0.0084; Dec 20, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2025 $0.06; Jun 20, 2025 $0.10; Sep 19, 2025 $0.10; Dec 19, 2025 $0.11; Mar 20, 2026 $0.08; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Sep 18, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
LOHAAll LOHA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CRTC vs LOHA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CRTC 11.9%since Dec 2023LOHA No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CRTC 1.09since Dec 2023LOHA No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CRTC −19.1%since Nov 2023LOHA No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CRTC 0.95LOHA −0.29

Popular comparisons

  • CRTCBvsLRNDA

    Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsLRNDA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CRTCBvsTECBA

    Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsTECBA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CRTCBvsHOMZB

    Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsHOMZB

    Roundhill HALO ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.