Skip to content

LOHA vs TECB

Roundhill HALO ETF

LOHABCboe

iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

TECBANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TECB −0.05pt a year

LOHA0.35%TECB0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

LOHA 3.3×the volume

LOHA31.1KTECB9.36K

LOHA vs TECB Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.8%LOHA+7.4%TECB

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. LOHA +1.8%. TECB +7.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%10%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LOHA 0.35%
TECB 0.30%, better
Fund size
LOHA $35M
TECB $493M
1Y total return
LOHA No data
TECB +18.8%
Yield (12M)
LOHA No data
TECB 0.29%
Holdings
LOHA 102
TECB 173
Avg volume (30D)
LOHA 31.1K sh, better
TECB 9.36K sh
NAV per share
LOHA $26.46
TECB $75.32
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LOHA: Cost 60, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 92, Durability 51. TECB: Cost 79, Risk 55, Mission 92, Tradability 72, Holdings 61, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for LOHA, TECB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLOHATECB
Cost30% weightB60A79Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA92
Risk15% weightA79HigherB55
Tradability15% weightC54A72Higher
Holdings10% weightA92HigherB61
Durability5% weightC51A91Higher

Rank among US Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LOHA and TECB are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Thematic⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

TECB ranks 2nd and LOHA 3rd of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1ALRNDNYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BLOHARoundhill HALO ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BHOMZHoya Capital Housing ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LOHABRoundhill HALO ETF

TECBAiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

In short

LOHA No data

TECB Five breakthroughs (AI and robotics, cloud and data, cybersecurity, genomics, fintech) in one iShares index fund, priced well under the typical US thematic ETF. Multisector by design, so healthcare and finance names sit beside the chip and software crowd.

Stated mandate

LOHA No data

TECB TECB seeks to track an index of U.S. companies that may benefit from robotics and artificial intelligence, cloud and data technology, cybersecurity, genomics and immunology, and financial technology.

Why people hold it

LOHA No data

  • TECB 0.30% a year, roughly half the median expense ratio in its US thematic peer group. With themes, cost is the one edge you keep no matter which breakthrough actually breaks through.
  • Roughly 170 stocks spread across five themes rather than a concentrated bet on one idea, so no single storyline carries the fund by itself.ishares.com
  • Rules pick the stocks, not a manager's mood: it follows the NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index and has tracked it tightly since the 2020 launch, among the cleaner builds in its thematic group.ishares.com

Worth knowing

LOHA No data

  • TECB This is a growth-theme basket with no ballast. Five fast-moving innovation sleeves can swing harder than the broad market in both directions.
  • Volume is light next to the megacap tech giants. For quick in-and-out trades, the bid-ask spread can cost more than the fee does.
  • Cheap, but not the cheapest on the block: LRND charges 0.14% for a broad US R&D-leaders screen that overlaps some of the same territory.

Full LOHA profile⁠

Full TECB profile⁠

LOHA vs TECB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LOHA vs TECB Cost

Overpaying LOHA vs TECB

$977

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LOHA 0.35%

    $7,126

  • TECB 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LOHA 0.35%
  • TECB 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530LOHA $7,126TECB $6,149

Year by year

YearLOHATECBOverpaying
10$634$545$89
20$2,454$2,113$341
30$7,126$6,149$977

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%LOHA
  • 0.30%TECB, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Thematic funds
  • Median 0.35%

TECB 5th cheapest of 22 funds

LOHA 7th cheapest of 22 funds

LOHA vs TECB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LOHA No data
TECB 0.29%
Payout (12M)
LOHA None
TECB $0.22
Last payment
LOHA No data
TECB $0.05
Ex-dividend
LOHA No data
TECB Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
LOHA No data
TECB Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
LOHA No data
TECB Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

LOHAAll LOHA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TECBQuarterly · 27 paymentsAll TECB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 27 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Mar 25, 2020 $0.14; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.07; Mar 25, 2021 $0.04; Jun 10, 2021 $0.02; Sep 24, 2021 $0.04; Dec 13, 2021 $0.04; Mar 24, 2022 $0.05; Jun 9, 2022 $0.03; Sep 26, 2022 $0.05; Dec 13, 2022 $0.04; Mar 23, 2023 $0.03; Jun 7, 2023 $0.02; Sep 26, 2023 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.02; Mar 21, 2024 $0.05; Jun 11, 2024 $0.01; Sep 25, 2024 $0.08; Dec 17, 2024 $0.04; Mar 18, 2025 $0.03; Jun 16, 2025 $0.04; Sep 16, 2025 $0.05; Dec 16, 2025 $0.07; Mar 17, 2026 $0.04; Jun 15, 2026 $0.05; Sep 15, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.10202020232026YTD

LOHA vs TECB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LOHA No dataTECB 19.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LOHA No dataTECB 1.17
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LOHA No dataTECB −41.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LOHA −0.29TECB 1.25

Popular comparisons

  • LOHABvsLRNDA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TECBAvsLRNDA

    iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOHABvsHOMZB

    Roundhill HALO ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TECBAvsHOMZB

    iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LOHABvsCRTCB

    Roundhill HALO ETF · Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TECBAvsCRTCB

    iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF · Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.