PANG ranks 3rd and CRUC 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRUC vs PANG
0.0%by weight
CRUC −0.31pt a year
0.45%0.76%
PANG 41.9×the volume
1.07K44.6K
CRUC vs PANG Performance
−32.2%+7.0%
- CRUC 0.45%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- CRUC $0
- PANG $9M
- CRUC
- PANG +91.6%
- CRUC 1
- PANG 4
- CRUC 1.07K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- CRUC $11.12
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRUC | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | C52 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | F22 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F22 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRUC and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRUCC
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRUC vs PANG Holdings
How CRUC and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CRUC and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CRUC and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CRUCMore in PANG | CRUC | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CRUC199.1%
- PANG208.4%
- CRUC0
- PANG1
Asset class
- CRUC
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CRUC0
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in CRUC
0 securities, 0.0% of CRUC by weight
Only in PANG
1 security, 8.4% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.43%
Weight gaps
CRUC and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRUC vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs CRUC
$5,615
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRUC 0.45%
$9,041
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRUC | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,353 | $541 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,142 | $2,014 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,656 | $5,615 |
- 0.45%CRUC, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
CRUC 7th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CRUC vs PANG Dividends
- CRUC None
- PANG
- CRUC
- PANG $1.30
- CRUC
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CRUC
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CRUC
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CRUC vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRUC PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRUC PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CRUC PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CRUC 0.00PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.