UNHG ranks 2nd and CSCL 68th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CSCL vs UNHG
UNHG −0.30pt a year
1.07%0.77%
UNHG 20.0×the volume
36.3K726K
CSCL vs UNHG Performance
+67.8%+11.9%
- CSCL 1.07%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- CSCL $10M
- UNHG $63M
- CSCL +67.8%, better
- UNHG +11.9%
- CSCL 1.64%
- UNHG
- CSCL 9
- UNHG 5
- CSCL 36.3K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- CSCL $49.68
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSCL | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A90 |
| Risk | A86Higher | A83 |
| Tradability | C53 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B68Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CSCL and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSCLB
UNHGA
In short
CSCL Most single-stock leverage chases AI highfliers. CSCL aims at a networking incumbent instead: 200% of Cisco's daily move, before fees, reset every day. A bear twin on the same stock covers the other side.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
CSCL The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Cisco Systems, Inc. common shares.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSCL vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSCL vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying CSCL vs UNHG
$4,986
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSCL 1.07%
$19,815
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSCL | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,371 | $510 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $5,205 | $1,841 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $14,829 | $4,986 |
- 1.07%CSCL
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
CSCL 213th cheapest of 315 funds
CSCL vs UNHG Dividends
- CSCL 1.64%
- UNHG
- CSCL $0.76
- UNHG
- CSCL $0.20
- UNHG $1.90
- CSCL Sep 22, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- CSCL Sep 29, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- CSCL Quarterly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
CSCL vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSCL 71.2%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSCL 0.84UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CSCL −40.3%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CSCL 3.96UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.