PANG ranks 3rd and CSCL 68th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CSCL vs PANG
PANG −0.31pt a year
1.07%0.76%
PANG 1.2×the volume
36.3K44.6K
CSCL vs PANG Performance
+67.8%+91.6%
- CSCL 1.07%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- CSCL $10M
- PANG $9M
- CSCL +67.8%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- CSCL 1.64%
- PANG
- CSCL 9
- PANG 4
- CSCL 36.3K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- CSCL $49.68
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSCL | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A94 |
| Risk | A86Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | C53 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B68Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CSCL and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSCLB
PANGA
In short
CSCL Most single-stock leverage chases AI highfliers. CSCL aims at a networking incumbent instead: 200% of Cisco's daily move, before fees, reset every day. A bear twin on the same stock covers the other side.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
CSCL The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Cisco Systems, Inc. common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSCL vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSCL vs PANG Cost
Overpaying CSCL vs PANG
$5,159
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSCL 1.07%
$19,815
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSCL | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,353 | $528 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $5,142 | $1,904 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $14,656 | $5,159 |
- 1.07%CSCL
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CSCL 213th cheapest of 315 funds
CSCL vs PANG Dividends
- CSCL 1.64%
- PANG
- CSCL $0.76
- PANG
- CSCL $0.20
- PANG $1.30
- CSCL Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CSCL Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CSCL Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CSCL vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSCL 71.2%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSCL 0.84PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CSCL −40.3%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CSCL 3.96PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.