CSHI ranks 1st and NBOS 15th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
CSHI vs NBOS
CSHI −0.21pt a year
0.38%0.59%
CSHI 6.9×the volume
747K108K
CSHI vs NBOS Performance
+4.8%+13.5%
- CSHI 0.38%, better
- NBOS 0.59%
- CSHI $2.14B
- NBOS $535M
- CSHI +4.8%
- NBOS +13.5%, better
- CSHI 4.82%
- NBOS 8.30%, better
- CSHI 20
- NBOS 11
- CSHI 747K sh, better
- NBOS 108K sh
- CSHI $49.63
- NBOS $27.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSHI | NBOS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A89 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A82Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A70 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B62 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. CSHI and NBOS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSHIA
NBOSB
In short
CSHI A T-bill sleeve with a side hustle. CSHI parks in 1-3 month Treasuries and sells S&P 500 index puts on top, paying monthly. In a peer group built on stocks plus options, it is the cash-first one.
NBOS Most options-income ETFs sell calls on stocks they already own. NBOS flips the trade: it sells collateralized puts on the S&P 500 and parks the collateral in bonds, so premium, not dividends, does the work.
Stated mandate
CSHI The Fund seeks monthly income by investing in 1-3 month Treasury bills or related ETFs and using S&P 500 Index put options to generate additional income.
NBOS The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and income mainly by selling collateralized puts on U.S. indices, including the S&P 500 and related S&P 500 suite indices, while investing collateral in fixed-income instruments intended to moderate volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSHI vs NBOS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSHI vs NBOS Cost
Overpaying NBOS vs CSHI
$3,929
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSHI 0.38%
$7,706
NBOS 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSHI | NBOS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $1,058 | $370 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $4,051 | $1,393 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $11,635 | $3,929 |
- 0.38%CSHI, cheaper
- 0.59%NBOS
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
CSHI 13th cheapest of 51 funds
NBOS 24th cheapest of 51 funds
CSHI vs NBOS Dividends
- CSHI 4.82%
- NBOS 8.30%, better
- CSHI $2.39
- NBOS $2.35
- CSHI $0.21
- NBOS $0.22
- CSHI Oct 14, 2026
- NBOS Oct 27, 2026
- CSHI Oct 16, 2026
- NBOS Oct 30, 2026
- CSHI Monthly
- NBOS Monthly
Distribution history
CSHI vs NBOS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSHI 0.3%NBOS 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSHI 2.04NBOS 1.39
- Worst fall
- CSHI −1.7%NBOS −12.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CSHI 0.01NBOS 0.39
CSHI and NBOS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
