IVVW ranks 3rd and NBOS 15th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs NBOS
0.0%by weight
IVVW −0.34pt a year
0.25%0.59%
NBOS 2.8×the volume
38.2K108K
IVVW vs NBOS Performance
+13.4%+13.5%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- NBOS 0.59%
- IVVW $338M
- NBOS $535M
- IVVW +13.4%
- NBOS +13.5%, better
- IVVW 18.52%, better
- NBOS 8.30%
- IVVW 506
- NBOS 11
- IVVW 38.2K sh
- NBOS 108K sh, better
- IVVW $42.84
- NBOS $27.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | NBOS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C49Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A73 | |
| Durability | A72Higher | B62 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and NBOS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
NBOSB
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
NBOS Most options-income ETFs sell calls on stocks they already own. NBOS flips the trade: it sells collateralized puts on the S&P 500 and parks the collateral in bonds, so premium, not dividends, does the work.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
NBOS The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and income mainly by selling collateralized puts on U.S. indices, including the S&P 500 and related S&P 500 suite indices, while investing collateral in fixed-income instruments intended to moderate volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs NBOS Holdings
How IVVW and NBOS differ
0.0%
About this figure: IVVW earns income from options, which aren’t counted.
NBOS earns income from options, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for NBOS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IVVWMore in NBOS | Gap | IVVW | NBOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | NBOS +0.4 points | 99.5% | 100.0% | |
| Switzerland | IVVW +0.3 points | 0.3% | 0.0% | |
| China | IVVW +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% | |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- IVVW37.7%
- NBOS102.3%
- IVVW503
- NBOS9
Asset class
- IVVW
- Stocks
- NBOS
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in IVVW503
- In both0
- Only in NBOS9
Only in IVVW
503 securities, 100% of IVVW by weight
- Apple7.87%
- NVIDIA7.12%
- Microsoft6.21%
- Amazon.com Inc4.01%
- Alphabet Class A2.63%
- Broadcom Inc2.20%
- Alphabet Class C2.13%
- Meta Platforms Class A2.12%
- Eli Lilly1.71%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.67%
- Tesla Inc1.59%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co1.40%
- Micron Technology1.23%
- Advanced Micro Devices1.15%
- Visa Class A1.13%
- Exxonmobil Holdings Corp1.07%
- Johnson & Johnson1.05%
- Walmart0.88%
- Mastercard Class A0.83%
- AbbVie0.81%
- Costco Wholesale Corp0.74%
- Chevron0.66%
- Procter & Gamble0.61%
- Coca-Cola0.58%
- Cisco Systems Inc0.58%
- Palantir Technologies Class A0.58%
- Merck & Co Inc0.57%
- UnitedHealth Group0.56%
- Home Depot0.54%
- Ge Aerospace0.53%
- Bank of America0.51%
- Philip Morris International0.49%
- Intel Corporation0.44%
- Applied Material Inc0.42%
- Netflix0.42%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific0.40%
- Caterpillar Inc0.40%
- Palo Alto Networks0.40%
- Rtx0.40%
- Wells Fargo0.40%
- Texas Instrument0.40%
- Goldman Sachs Group0.40%
- Lam Research0.40%
- Amgen Inc0.39%
- Linde PLC0.37%
- International Business Machines Co0.36%
- Oracle0.36%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Class A0.35%
- Morgan Stanley0.34%
- Gilead Sciences0.33%
Only in NBOS
9 securities, 100% of NBOS by weight
- Us Treasury N/B 06/27 4.62513.35%
- Us Treasury N/B 12/27 413.05%
- Us Treasury N/B 03/27 4.2512.76%
- Us Treasury N/B 09/27 3.37512.32%
- Us Treasury N/B 03/28 3.87512.08%
- Us Treasury N/B 06/28 3.87512.06%
- Us Treasury N/B 09/28 3.37511.93%
- Us Treasury N/B 12/26 4.37511.28%
- Ssc Government Mm Gvmxx2.45%
Weight gaps
IVVW and NBOS share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs NBOS Cost
Overpaying NBOS vs IVVW
$6,476
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
NBOS 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | NBOS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $1,058 | $603 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $4,051 | $2,282 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $11,635 | $6,476 |
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- 0.59%NBOS
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
NBOS 24th cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs NBOS Dividends
- IVVW 18.52%, better
- NBOS 8.30%
- IVVW $8.10
- NBOS $2.35
- IVVW $0.58
- NBOS $0.22
- IVVW Nov 3, 2026
- NBOS Oct 27, 2026
- IVVW Nov 6, 2026
- NBOS Oct 30, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- NBOS Monthly
Distribution history
IVVW vs NBOS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%NBOS 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10NBOS 1.39
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%NBOS −12.7%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54NBOS 0.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.