TBLL ranks 4th and CSHP 44th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
CSHP vs TBLL
TBLL −0.12pt a year
0.20%0.08%
TBLL 7.3×the volume
42.8K313K
CSHP vs TBLL Performance
+3.7%+3.6%
- CSHP 0.20%
- TBLL 0.08%, better
- CSHP $382M
- TBLL $2.9B
- CSHP +3.7%, better
- TBLL +3.6%
- CSHP 4.00%, better
- TBLL 3.59%
- CSHP 547
- TBLL 90
- CSHP 42.8K sh
- TBLL 313K sh, better
- CSHP $99.76
- TBLL $105.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSHP | TBLL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | D36 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | B66Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A80Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. CSHP and TBLL are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSHPB
TBLLA
In short
CSHP Cash parking with a motor. BlackRock's actively managed short-term fund measures itself against 3-month T-bills and can reach across short-dated bonds and developed-market equities to try to clear that bar.
TBLL The bill fund that stretches to a full year. TBLL owns U.S. Treasuries maturing in one year or less and charges 0.08%, well under the typical fund in its 0-1 year Treasury group.
Stated mandate
CSHP The Fund seeks total return above the ICE BofA 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index through actively managed exposure to short-term fixed income securities and equities across global developed markets.
TBLL The fund invests primarily in U.S. Treasury obligations with maturities of one year or less and seeks exposure to the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSHP vs TBLL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSHP vs TBLL Cost
Overpaying CSHP vs TBLL
$2,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSHP 0.20%
$4,155
TBLL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSHP | TBLL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $147 | $218 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $575 | $846 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $1,689 | $2,466 |
- 0.20%CSHP
- 0.08%TBLL, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
TBLL 10th cheapest of 78 funds
CSHP 45th cheapest of 78 funds
CSHP vs TBLL Dividends
- CSHP 4.00%, better
- TBLL 3.59%
- CSHP $3.98
- TBLL $3.79
- CSHP $0.31
- TBLL $0.34
- CSHP Oct 1, 2026
- TBLL Oct 19, 2026
- CSHP Oct 6, 2026
- TBLL Oct 23, 2026
- CSHP Monthly
- TBLL Monthly
Distribution history
CSHP vs TBLL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSHP 0.4%TBLL 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSHP −0.36TBLL −0.66
- Worst fall
- CSHP −0.7%TBLL −0.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CSHP 0.002TBLL 0.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.