CWB ranks 2nd and FCVT 5th of 7 funds in the Convertible Bond Category.
CWB vs FCVT
CWB −0.55pt a year
0.40%0.95%
CWB 21.3×the volume
629K29.5K
CWB +0.7pt
+10.7%+10.0%
CWB vs FCVT Performance
+19.1%+15.8%
- CWB 0.40%, better
- FCVT 0.95%
- CWB $5.46B
- FCVT $78M
- CWB +3.3%, better
- FCVT +2.4%
- CWB 1.68%, better
- FCVT 1.21%
- CWB 365
- FCVT 124
- CWB 629K sh, better
- FCVT 29.5K sh
- CWB $96.53
- FCVT $44.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CWB | FCVT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C50Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A79Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B67 |
Rank among Convertible Bond funds
Same Category. CWB and FCVT are both graded against the same 7 Convertible Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CWBA
FCVTC
In short
CWB Convertible bonds are the hybrids of corporate credit: debt that can turn into stock. CWB has packaged them since 2009, tracking a Bloomberg index tilted toward the market's tradable issues, and it pays monthly.
FCVT Convertibles are a hybrid, quirky corner of the bond market, and this one hands the keys to a Los Angeles boutique that specializes in them. Active, global, no index to hug since 2015. Specialist judgment is the whole pitch, and you pay up for it.
Stated mandate
CWB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Liquid Bond Index before fees and expenses. It invests in qualifying U.S. convertible securities.
FCVT The fund is actively managed and seeks total return by investing at least 80% of net assets in a diversified portfolio of U.S. and non-U.S. convertible securities under normal market conditions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CWB vs FCVT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CWB vs FCVT Cost
Overpaying FCVT vs CWB
$9,779
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CWB 0.40%
$8,090
FCVT 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CWB | FCVT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,678 | $955 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $6,322 | $3,529 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $17,869 | $9,779 |
- 0.40%CWB, cheaper
- 0.95%FCVT
- Middle half of Convertible Bond funds
- Median 0.69%
CWB 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
FCVT 7th cheapest of 7 funds
CWB vs FCVT Dividends
- CWB 1.68%, better
- FCVT 1.21%
- CWB $1.59
- FCVT $0.54
- CWB $0.09
- FCVT $0.05
- CWB Oct 1, 2026
- FCVT Oct 21, 2026
- CWB Oct 6, 2026
- FCVT Oct 30, 2026
- CWB Monthly
- FCVT Monthly
Distribution history
CWB vs FCVT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CWB
- FCVT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CWB 12.8%, betterFCVT 15.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CWB 0.85, betterFCVT 0.81
- Worst fall
- CWB −28.4%, betterFCVT −30.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CWB 1.09FCVT 1.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.