JMBS ranks 1st and DANA 10th of 10 funds in the Core Securitized Bond Category.
DANA vs JMBS
JMBS −0.14pt a year
0.35%0.21%
JMBS 182.9×the volume
4.83K883K
DANA vs JMBS Performance
+1.5%−0.3%
- DANA 0.35%
- JMBS 0.21%, better
- DANA $18M
- JMBS $6.17B
- DANA
- JMBS +0.4%
- DANA
- JMBS 5.39%
- DANA 94
- JMBS 414
- DANA 4.83K sh
- JMBS 883K sh, better
- DANA $25.04
- JMBS $43.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DANA | JMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A93Higher |
| Mission | F0 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A74Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | D27 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | C48Higher | F14 |
| Durability | F24 | A82Higher |
Rank among Core Securitized Bond funds
Same Category. DANA and JMBS are both graded against the same 10 Core Securitized Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DANAD
JMBSA
In short
DANA Dana targets portfolio duration of 0.60 to 2.50 years and an average credit quality of AA-/Aa3, then pays monthly. Grouped with the core bond crowd, it is built more like a short-duration parking spot than a core holding.
JMBS The original actively managed mortgage-backed securities ETF, launched in 2018. Rather than replicate the MBS index, the team picks through agency mortgage bonds, a corner of the market where prepayment behavior makes security selection its own craft.
Stated mandate
DANA The Fund seeks to preserve capital and provide current income. It is actively managed and primarily invests in high-quality, cash-flow-producing fixed-income securities, focusing on U.S. government securities and investment-grade corporate bonds.
JMBS The fund seeks a high level of total return through both income and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DANA vs JMBS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DANA vs JMBS Cost
Overpaying DANA vs JMBS
$2,769
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DANA 0.35%
$7,126
JMBS 0.21%
$4,357
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DANA | JMBS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $383 | $251 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $1,491 | $963 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $4,357 | $2,769 |
- 0.35%DANA
- 0.21%JMBS, cheaper
- Middle half of Core Securitized Bond funds
- Median 0.38%
JMBS cheapest of 10 funds
DANA 4th cheapest of 10 funds
DANA vs JMBS Dividends
- DANA
- JMBS 5.39%
- DANA
- JMBS $2.35
- DANA $0.06
- JMBS $0.19
- DANA Oct 27, 2026
- JMBS Oct 30, 2026
- DANA Oct 28, 2026
- JMBS Nov 5, 2026
- DANA Monthly
- JMBS Monthly
Distribution history
DANA vs JMBS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DANA JMBS 6.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- DANA JMBS 0.31
- Worst fall
- DANA JMBS −16.5%
- Market sensitivity
- DANA 0.04JMBS 1.20
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.