DAPP ranks 4th and IBLC 5th of 20 funds in the Crypto Industry Stocks Category.
DAPP vs IBLC
50.9%by weight
IBLC −0.05pt a year
0.52%0.47%
DAPP 68.0×the volume
826K12.2K
DAPP +3.7pt
+32.0%+28.3%
DAPP vs IBLC Performance
−43.8%−41.5%
- DAPP 0.52%
- IBLC 0.47%, better
- DAPP $215M
- IBLC $64M
- DAPP −43.8%
- IBLC −41.5%, better
- DAPP 0.00%
- IBLC 7.53%, better
- DAPP 22
- IBLC 50
- DAPP 826K sh, better
- IBLC 12.2K sh
- DAPP $14.17
- IBLC $35.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DAPP | IBLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A84Higher |
| Mission | F9 | |
| Risk | D28 | C42Higher |
| Tradability | A84Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | C49Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A78Higher | B62 |
Rank among Crypto Industry Stocks funds
Same Category. DAPP and IBLC are both graded against the same 20 Crypto Industry Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DAPPB
IBLCB
In short
DAPP Crypto exposure without the crypto. DAPP holds the equities of the digital-asset economy (exchanges, miners, infrastructure) and by its own mandate never buys a coin, a coin derivative, or an ICO.
IBLC BlackRock's picks-and-shovels take on crypto: roughly 40 global companies that build, run and use blockchain technology. You own the businesses around the coins, in a plain stock ETF, rather than the coins themselves.
Stated mandate
DAPP Before fees and expenses, the Fund seeks to follow the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, which is designed to represent companies participating in digital-asset economies.
IBLC The fund seeks to track an index of global companies that develop, innovate in, and apply blockchain and crypto technologies, providing exposure to firms involved in digital transformation and blockchain applications.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DAPP vs IBLC Holdings
How DAPP and IBLC differ
50.9%
Shared holdings make up 67.9% of DAPP and 60.4% of IBLC.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings50.9%
- Sector69.0%
- Country80.6%
Sector
| Sector | More in DAPPMore in IBLC | DAPP | IBLC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | DAPP +26.6 points | 55.0% | 28.4% |
| Technology | IBLC +26.5 points | 40.7% | 67.2% |
| Communication | IBLC +4.3 points | 0.0% | 4.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | DAPP +4.3 points | 4.3% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | IBLC +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Energy | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DAPPMore in IBLC | DAPP | IBLC |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | IBLC +11.0 points | 80.6% | 91.6% |
| China | IBLC +6.8 points | 0.0% | 6.8% |
| Australia | DAPP +4.9 points | 4.9% | 0.0% |
| Japan | DAPP +4.3 points | 4.3% | 0.0% |
| Cayman Islands | DAPP +4.1 points | 4.1% | 0.0% |
| Singapore | DAPP +3.6 points | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| Hong Kong | DAPP +2.5 points | 2.5% | 0.0% |
| Germany | IBLC +1.6 points | 0.0% | 1.6% |
Concentration
- DAPP64.2%
- IBLC66.5%
- DAPP20
- IBLC41
Asset class
- DAPP
- Alternatives
- IBLC
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DAPP5
- In both15
- Only in IBLC26
Only in DAPP
5 securities, 32.0% of DAPP by weight
- Block Inc10.86%
- Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc7.07%
- Strategy Inc6.26%
- Metaplanet Inc4.25%
- Figure Technology Solutions Inc3.60%
Only in IBLC
26 securities, 39.5% of IBLC by weight
- Mastercard Class A5.97%
- Advanced Micro Devices5.73%
- International Business Machines Co5.20%
- NVIDIA4.82%
- Tencent Holdings4.69%
- Ionic Digital Inc Class A2.21%
- Infineon Technologies AG1.58%
- Ping An Insurance (Group) of China1.49%
- Robinhood Markets Class A1.39%
- PayPal Holdings1.05%
- Keel Infrastructure Corp1.04%
- Etoro Group Class A0.93%
- Securitize Corp0.87%
- Cambricon Technologies Corporation0.83%
- Hive Digital Technologies Ltd0.43%
- Bitgo Holdings Inc Class A0.25%
- Digi Power X Inc0.17%
- Z Squared Inc0.15%
- American Bitcoin Class A0.13%
- Canaan Adr Inc0.12%
- Canton Strategic Holdings Inc0.11%
- Soluna Holdings Inc0.10%
- Bakkt Inc Class A0.10%
- Gemini Space Station Inc Class A0.09%
- Indokripto Koin Semesta0.03%
- Voyager Digital Ltd0.00%
Weight gaps
All 15 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in DAPPMore in IBLC | DAPP | IBLC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Circle Internet Group Inc | IBLC +3.68 points | 7.73% | 11.41% |
| Coinbase Global Inc | IBLC +3.35 points | 9.30% | 12.65% |
| Bullish | DAPP +2.99 points | 3.73% | 0.74% |
| Bitdeer Technologies Group | DAPP +2.66 points | 3.46% | 0.80% |
| Bc Technology Group Ltd | DAPP +2.42 points | 2.66% | 0.24% |
| Cleanspark Inc | DAPP +2.12 points | 3.68% | 1.56% |
| Iren Ltd | IBLC +1.86 points | 4.85% | 6.71% |
| Galaxy Digital Inc | DAPP +1.56 points | 4.05% | 2.49% |
| Mara Holdings Inc | DAPP +1.52 points | 3.62% | 2.10% |
| Core Scientific Inc | DAPP +1.31 points | 4.66% | 3.35% |
| Terawulf Inc | DAPP +0.99 points | 4.36% | 3.37% |
| Cipher Mining Inc | DAPP +0.71 points | 2.75% | 2.04% |
| Hut 8 Corp | IBLC +0.62 points | 4.82% | 5.44% |
| Riot Platforms Inc | DAPP +0.44 points | 4.10% | 3.66% |
| Applied Digital Corp | DAPP +0.33 points | 4.18% | 3.85% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DAPP vs IBLC Cost
Overpaying DAPP vs IBLC
$933
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DAPP 0.52%
$10,351
IBLC 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DAPP | IBLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $935 | $847 | $88 |
| 20 | $3,593 | $3,261 | $332 |
| 30 | $10,351 | $9,418 | $933 |
- 0.52%DAPP
- 0.47%IBLC, cheaper
- Middle half of Crypto Industry Stocks funds
- Median 0.66%
IBLC 4th cheapest of 20 funds
DAPP 6th cheapest of 20 funds
DAPP vs IBLC Dividends
- DAPP 0.00%
- IBLC 7.53%, better
- DAPP None
- IBLC $2.56
- DAPP
- IBLC $2.56
- DAPP
- IBLC Dec 16, 2025
- DAPP
- IBLC Dec 19, 2025
- DAPP
- IBLC Twice a year
Distribution history
DAPP vs IBLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DAPP 69.3%IBLC 62.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DAPP 0.73, betterIBLC 0.69
- Worst fall
- DAPP −91.9%IBLC −62.5%
- Market sensitivity
- DAPP 3.89IBLC 3.60
DAPP and IBLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.52% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


