PSCX ranks 1st and DAPR 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
DAPR vs PSCX
PSCX −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
DAPR 8.1×the volume
8.05K998
PSCX +2.6pt
+5.9%+8.5%
DAPR vs PSCX Performance
+33.4%+50.6%
- DAPR 0.85%
- PSCX 0.49%, better
- DAPR $334M
- PSCX $47M
- DAPR +7.5%
- PSCX +10.2%, better
- DAPR 3
- PSCX 3
- DAPR 8.05K sh, better
- PSCX 998 sh
- DAPR $41.69
- PSCX $33.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DAPR | PSCX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | C47Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | C41Higher | D28 |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. DAPR and PSCX are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DAPRC
PSCXB
In short
DAPR Most buffer funds cushion the first 10% of a drop. This one skips that and guards the deeper stretch: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, the fund targets -5% through -30%. April is its rung on First Trust's monthly ladder.
PSCX A 25% deep buffer against the S&P 500, reset every January, for 0.49% a year, well under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group. The trade-off: a cap on the upside, set fresh each outcome period.
Stated mandate
DAPR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 12.04% upside cap. It seeks to buffer losses from -5% through -30% during the April 20, 2026-April 16, 2027 target outcome period.
PSCX The fund seeks to match the pre-fee returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DAPR vs PSCX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DAPR vs PSCX Cost
Overpaying DAPR vs PSCX
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DAPR 0.85%
$16,199
PSCX 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DAPR | PSCX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%DAPR
- 0.49%PSCX, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
PSCX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
DAPR 8th cheapest of 19 funds
DAPR vs PSCX Dividends
- DAPR None
- PSCX None
Distribution history
DAPR vs PSCX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DAPR
- PSCX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DAPR 4.7%, betterPSCX 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- DAPR 1.46, betterPSCX 1.45
- Worst fall
- DAPR −10.5%PSCX −10.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DAPR 0.29PSCX 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.