PSCQ ranks 3rd and DAPR 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
DAPR vs PSCQ
PSCQ −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
DAPR 3.3×the volume
8.05K2.47K
PSCQ +3.1pt
+5.9%+9.0%
DAPR vs PSCQ Performance
+33.4%+53.5%
- DAPR 0.85%
- PSCQ 0.49%, better
- DAPR $334M
- PSCQ $49M
- DAPR +7.5%
- PSCQ +9.8%, better
- DAPR 3
- PSCQ 3
- DAPR 8.05K sh, better
- PSCQ 2.47K sh
- DAPR $41.69
- PSCQ $32.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DAPR | PSCQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D33 | C48Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | C41Higher | F17 |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. DAPR and PSCQ are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DAPRC
PSCQB
In short
DAPR Most buffer funds cushion the first 10% of a drop. This one skips that and guards the deeper stretch: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, the fund targets -5% through -30%. April is its rung on First Trust's monthly ladder.
PSCQ A deep buffer with a deductible: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then the next 25 points get cushioned, up to a cap reset each October. At 0.49% a year, it is a low-cost way to run that trade.
Stated mandate
DAPR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 12.04% upside cap. It seeks to buffer losses from -5% through -30% during the April 20, 2026-April 16, 2027 target outcome period.
PSCQ The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DAPR vs PSCQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DAPR vs PSCQ Cost
Overpaying DAPR vs PSCQ
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DAPR 0.85%
$16,199
PSCQ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DAPR | PSCQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%DAPR
- 0.49%PSCQ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
PSCQ 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
DAPR 8th cheapest of 19 funds
DAPR vs PSCQ Dividends
- DAPR None
- PSCQ None
Distribution history
DAPR vs PSCQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DAPR
- PSCQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DAPR 4.7%, betterPSCQ 6.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DAPR 1.46, betterPSCQ 1.30
- Worst fall
- DAPR −10.5%PSCQ −9.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DAPR 0.29PSCQ 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.