JPXN ranks 4th and DBJP 9th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
DBJP vs JPXN
DBJP −0.03pt a year
0.45%0.48%
DBJP 2.0×the volume
32.3K16.5K
DBJP +7.5pt
+16.0%+8.5%
DBJP vs JPXN Performance
+151.1%+53.6%
- DBJP 0.45%, better
- JPXN 0.48%
- DBJP $710M
- JPXN $166M
- DBJP +22.6%, better
- JPXN +18.1%
- DBJP 1.27%
- JPXN 2.73%, better
- DBJP 169
- JPXN 402
- DBJP 32.3K sh, better
- JPXN 16.5K sh
- DBJP $112.70
- JPXN $100.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DBJP | JPXN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76Higher | B68 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C53 | C53 |
| Tradability | B57 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A70Higher |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. DBJP and JPXN are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DBJPB
JPXNA
In short
DBJP A yen hedge wrapped around the whole Japanese market. DBJP holds a standard MSCI Japan basket of roughly 170 large and mid-cap names and hedges the yen back to dollars, so the currency stops driving the result.
JPXN Most Japan ETFs just buy Tokyo. JPXN follows the JPX-Nikkei 400, an index that screens for profitability and shareholder-oriented practices, making it the corporate-reform cut of Japan rather than plain country beta.
Stated mandate
DBJP The Fund passively seeks to track an index representing the Japanese equity market while reducing exposure to movements between the Japanese yen and U.S. dollar.
JPXN JPXN seeks to follow an index of Japanese equities that applies profitability and shareholder-oriented practice screens. It is intended to provide targeted exposure to Japan as a single-country allocation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DBJP vs JPXN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DBJP vs JPXN Cost
Overpaying JPXN vs DBJP
$564
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DBJP 0.45%
$9,041
JPXN 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DBJP | JPXN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $865 | $53 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,328 | $200 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $9,605 | $564 |
- 0.45%DBJP, cheaper
- 0.48%JPXN
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
DBJP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
JPXN 6th cheapest of 18 funds
DBJP vs JPXN Dividends
- DBJP 1.27%
- JPXN 2.73%, better
- DBJP $1.42
- JPXN $2.75
- DBJP $1.40
- JPXN $0.64
- DBJP Jun 18, 2026
- JPXN Jun 15, 2026
- DBJP Jun 26, 2026
- JPXN Jun 18, 2026
- DBJP Twice a year
- JPXN Twice a year
Distribution history
DBJP vs JPXN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DBJP
- JPXN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DBJP 12.6%JPXN 12.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DBJP 1.56, betterJPXN 1.21
- Worst fall
- DBJP −21.5%, betterJPXN −29.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DBJP 0.57JPXN 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.