DDFZ ranks 1st and DLNV 7th of 9 funds in the S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer Category.
DDFZ vs DLNV
0.0%by weight
DDFZ −0.06pt a year
0.79%0.85%
DDFZ 43.5×the volume
42K965
DDFZ vs DLNV Performance
+1.1%+2.1%
- DDFZ 0.79%, better
- DLNV 0.85%
- DDFZ $144M
- DLNV $20M
- DDFZ 5
- DLNV 4
- DDFZ 42K sh, better
- DLNV 965 sh
- DDFZ $19.72
- DLNV $33.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDFZ | DLNV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | F21 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B58 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | B58 | A70Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | B55 |
Rank among S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds
Same Category. DDFZ and DLNV are both graded against the same 9 S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDFZB
DLNVD
In short
DLNV Most buffer funds just cushion a drop. This one aims to convert it: if SPY finishes the one-year period down but within 10%, DLNV targets an equal-sized gain, with a 10% buffer on deeper losses. Upside is capped, and the cap resets each November.
Stated mandate
DLNV The fund seeks to match SPY's price return up to a preset upside cap, or to match the absolute value of SPY losses through a 10% inverse-performance threshold, while buffering 10% of losses beyond that threshold over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDFZ vs DLNV Holdings
How DDFZ and DLNV differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DDFZ and 0.0% of DLNV.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for DLNV.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DDFZMore in DLNV | DDFZ | DLNV |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- DDFZ127.6%
- DLNV102.5%
- DDFZ5
- DLNV3
Asset class
- DDFZ
- Equity
- DLNV
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in DDFZ5
- In both0
- Only in DLNV3
Only in DDFZ
5 securities, 100% of DDFZ by weight
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF96.40%
- Voo 05/28/2027 584.21 P21.71%
- Voo 05/28/2027 695.47 P8.41%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.98%
- Voo 05/28/2027 723.29 C0.08%
Only in DLNV
3 securities, 100% of DLNV by weight
- 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.62101.70%
- 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 659.060.26%
- 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 576.680.18%
Weight gaps
DDFZ and DLNV share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDFZ vs DLNV Cost
Overpaying DLNV vs DDFZ
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDFZ 0.79%
$15,174
DLNV 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDFZ | DLNV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,508 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,706 | $375 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $16,199 | $1,025 |
- 0.79%DDFZ, cheaper
- 0.85%DLNV
- Middle half of S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds
- Median 0.79%
DDFZ cheapest of 9 funds
DLNV 6th cheapest of 9 funds
DDFZ vs DLNV Dividends
- DDFZ None
- DLNV None
Distribution history
DDFZ vs DLNV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- DDFZ 0.48DLNV 0.47
DDFZ and DLNV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
