Skip to content

DECT vs TENJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF

DECTBCboe

iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

TENJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TENJ −0.21pt a year

DECT0.74%TENJ0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

DECT 1.3×the volume

DECT32.4KTENJ24.6K

DECT vs TENJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.2%DECT+11.7%TENJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DECT +11.2%. TENJ +11.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DECT 0.74%
TENJ 0.53%, better
Fund size
DECT $38M
TENJ $47M
1Y total return
DECT +11.2%
TENJ +11.7%, better
Yield (12M)
DECT 0.00%
TENJ No data
Holdings
DECT 2
TENJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
DECT 32.4K sh, better
TENJ 24.6K sh
NAV per share
DECT $40.72
TENJ $28.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DECT: Cost 68, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 47, Durability 47. TENJ: Cost 86, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 51, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for DECT, TENJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDECTTENJ
Cost30% weightB68A86Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC42C49Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherB66
Holdings10% weightC47C51Higher
Durability5% weightC47HigherC41

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DECT and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

TENJ ranks 3rd and DECT 18th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 16BSTENiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 18BDECTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETFScore 58
  7. Rank 18BJUNTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DECTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF

TENJBiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

In short

DECT A December-dated buffer fund built on SPY's own share price, not the index behind it. It absorbs the first 10% of a year's decline in exchange for a cap on the upside, then resets every December 1.

TENJ No data

Stated mandate

DECT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each annual outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses. It uses FLEX Options referencing that ETF.

TENJ No data

Why people hold it

  • DECT The deal is written into the prospectus, not left to a manager's judgment: buffer the first 10% of the reference ETF's price loss over a one-year outcome period, capped on the upside, reset each December 1.
  • A registered 1940 Act ETF holding FLEX options on SPY, so the payoff shape comes in an exchange-traded wrapper rather than a bank-issued note.
  • At 0.74% a year it runs slightly under the typical shallow-buffer fund, and cost is one of its stronger suits in a crowded field where fees are the main separator.
  • Part of AllianzIM's dated ladder, which lets the December series be paired with other start months. Its six-month siblings (SIXD, SIXJ, SIXZ) carry the same fee but reset twice a year.

TENJ No data

Worth knowing

  • DECT Thinly traded compared with the giants of the buffer world, so bid-ask spread and order size matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • The stated 10% buffer and the cap apply to a full outcome period. Buy partway through and you inherit whatever protection and upside room are left, which can be more or less.
  • The target is SPY's share-price return, so dividends from the underlying stocks are not part of the payoff, and the fund itself has not been making distributions.

TENJ No data

Full DECT profile⁠

Full TENJ profile⁠

DECT vs TENJ Holdings

How DECT and TENJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DECT and 0.0% of TENJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for TENJ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DECT and TENJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in DECTMore in TENJ
United StatesTENJ +0.1 points
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoDECT +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DECT100.4%
  • TENJ102.6%

Securities held

  • DECT2
  • TENJ2

Asset class

DECT
Equity
TENJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DECT2
  • In both0
  • Only in TENJ2

Only in DECT

2 securities, 100% of DECT by weight

  • Spy 11/30/2026 5.06 C100.23%
  • Spy 11/30/2026 683.32 P0.15%

Only in TENJ

2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight

  • Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
  • JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%

Weight gaps

DECT and TENJ share no securities.

All 5 DECT holdings⁠All TENJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DECT vs TENJ Cost

Overpaying DECT vs TENJ

$3,771

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DECT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • TENJ 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DECT 0.74%
  • TENJ 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530DECT $14,307TENJ $10,536

Year by year

YearDECTTENJOverpaying
10$1,319$953$366
20$5,015$3,658$1,357
30$14,307$10,536$3,771

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%DECT
  • 0.53%TENJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds

DECT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

DECT vs TENJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DECT 0.00%
TENJ No data
Payout (12M)
DECT None
TENJ No data
Last payment
DECT No data
TENJ $0.07
Ex-dividend
DECT No data
TENJ Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
DECT No data
TENJ Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
DECT No data
TENJ Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

DECT1 paymentAll DECT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Jan 16, 2024 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
TENJIrregular · 1 paymentAll TENJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

DECT vs TENJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DECT 8.3%TENJ 8.6%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DECT 1.33TENJ 0.90since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DECT −13.3%since Dec 2022TENJ −5.5%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DECT 0.69TENJ 0.63

Popular comparisons

  • DECTBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TENJBvsZALTA

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TENJBvsAUGPB

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECTBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TENJBvsSIXJB

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.