TENJ ranks 3rd and DECT 18th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
DECT vs TENJ
0.0%by weight
TENJ −0.21pt a year
0.74%0.53%
DECT 1.3×the volume
32.4K24.6K
DECT vs TENJ Performance
+11.2%+11.7%
- DECT 0.74%
- TENJ 0.53%, better
- DECT $38M
- TENJ $47M
- DECT +11.2%
- TENJ +11.7%, better
- DECT 0.00%
- TENJ
- DECT 2
- TENJ 4
- DECT 32.4K sh, better
- TENJ 24.6K sh
- DECT $40.72
- TENJ $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DECT | TENJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | C47 | C51Higher |
| Durability | C47Higher | C41 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. DECT and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DECTB
TENJB
In short
DECT A December-dated buffer fund built on SPY's own share price, not the index behind it. It absorbs the first 10% of a year's decline in exchange for a cap on the upside, then resets every December 1.
Stated mandate
DECT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each annual outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses. It uses FLEX Options referencing that ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DECT vs TENJ Holdings
How DECT and TENJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DECT and 0.0% of TENJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TENJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DECTMore in TENJ | DECT | TENJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | TENJ +0.1 points | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | DECT +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- DECT100.4%
- TENJ102.6%
- DECT2
- TENJ2
Asset class
- DECT
- Equity
- TENJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DECT2
- In both0
- Only in TENJ2
Only in DECT
2 securities, 100% of DECT by weight
- Spy 11/30/2026 5.06 C100.23%
- Spy 11/30/2026 683.32 P0.15%
Only in TENJ
2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
- JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%
Weight gaps
DECT and TENJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DECT vs TENJ Cost
Overpaying DECT vs TENJ
$3,771
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DECT 0.74%
$14,307
TENJ 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DECT | TENJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $953 | $366 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,658 | $1,357 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $10,536 | $3,771 |
- 0.74%DECT
- 0.53%TENJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds
DECT 17th cheapest of 77 funds
DECT vs TENJ Dividends
- DECT 0.00%
- TENJ
- DECT None
- TENJ
- DECT
- TENJ $0.07
- DECT
- TENJ Dec 23, 2025
- DECT
- TENJ Dec 29, 2025
- DECT
- TENJ Irregular
Distribution history
DECT vs TENJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DECT 8.3%TENJ 8.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DECT 1.33TENJ 0.90
- Worst fall
- DECT −13.3%TENJ −5.5%
- Market sensitivity
- DECT 0.69TENJ 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.