DFAC ranks 3rd and OALC 36th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAC vs OALC
DFAC −0.32pt a year
0.17%0.49%
DFAC 87.6×the volume
2M22.9K
OALC +0.8pt
+22.3%+23.1%
DFAC vs OALC Performance
+16.1%+14.2%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- OALC 0.49%
- DFAC $87.7B
- OALC $276M
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- OALC +14.2%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- OALC 0.53%
- DFAC 2553
- OALC 212
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- OALC 22.9K sh
- DFAC $44.87
- OALC $40.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAC | OALC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B64 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | A83 |
| Durability | A97Higher | A72 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAC and OALC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFACA
OALCB
In short
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
OALC A values-screened cousin of the S&P 500. OneAscent cuts abortifacients, addictive products, predatory lenders and human-rights offenders, then optimizes what's left to stay close to the index. Faith-based filter, plain core shape.
Stated mandate
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
OALC The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAC vs OALC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAC vs OALC Cost
Overpaying OALC vs DFAC
$6,246
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
OALC 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAC | OALC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $883 | $573 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $3,394 | $2,183 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $9,792 | $6,246 |
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- 0.49%OALC
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
OALC 39th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC vs OALC Dividends
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- OALC 0.53%
- DFAC $0.39
- OALC $0.22
- DFAC $0.10
- OALC $0.22
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- OALC Dec 30, 2025
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- OALC Jan 5, 2026
- DFAC Quarterly
- OALC Annual
Distribution history
DFAC vs OALC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAC 12.6%, betterOALC 12.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAC 1.32OALC 1.35, better
- Worst fall
- DFAC −23.1%OALC −26.8%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAC 0.99OALC 0.99Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
DFAC and OALC in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.