DFAC ranks 3rd and WBIL 98th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAC vs WBIL
DFAC −1.53pt a year
0.17%1.70%
DFAC 549.5×the volume
2M3.65K
DFAC +5.7pt
+11.1%+5.4%
DFAC vs WBIL Performance
+69.4%+30.1%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- WBIL 1.70%
- DFAC $87.7B
- WBIL $29M
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- WBIL +11.0%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- WBIL 0.04%
- DFAC 2553
- WBIL 52
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- WBIL 3.65K sh
- DFAC $44.87
- WBIL $39.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAC | WBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A70 |
| Risk | B66Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | A76 |
| Durability | A97Higher | B55 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAC and WBIL are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFACA
WBILD
In short
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
WBIL Most equity funds ride the drop out. WBIL is built to sell into it: nightly quality screens pick the names, a tightening trailing stop decides when they go, and cash counts as a position. An active, risk-managed spin on the Russell 3000 universe, priced accordingly.
Stated mandate
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
WBIL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and potential current income while also seeking to protect principal during unfavorable market conditions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAC vs WBIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAC vs WBIL Cost
Overpaying WBIL vs DFAC
$25,495
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
WBIL 1.70%
$29,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAC | WBIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $2,911 | $2,601 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $10,606 | $9,395 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $29,041 | $25,495 |
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- 1.70%WBIL
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
WBIL 117th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC vs WBIL Dividends
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- WBIL 0.04%
- DFAC $0.39
- WBIL $0.02
- DFAC $0.10
- WBIL $0.02
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- WBIL Dec 18, 2025
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- WBIL Dec 19, 2025
- DFAC Quarterly
- WBIL Irregular
Distribution history
DFAC vs WBIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFAC
- WBIL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAC 12.6%, betterWBIL 14.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAC 1.32, betterWBIL 0.52
- Worst fall
- DFAC −23.1%, betterWBIL −25.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAC 0.99WBIL 1.19
DFAC and WBIL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

