Skip to content

DFAU vs WBIL

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

DFAUANYSE Arca

WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF

WBILDNYSE Arca

Overlap

9.9%by weight

Expense ratio

DFAU −1.58pt a year

DFAU0.12%WBIL1.70%

Avg volume · 30D

DFAU 152.1×the volume

DFAU555KWBIL3.65K

5Y return · a year

DFAU +6.2pt

DFAU+11.6%WBIL+5.4%

DFAU vs WBIL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+72.9%DFAU+30.1%WBIL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. DFAU +72.9%. WBIL +30.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DFAU 0.12%, better
WBIL 1.70%
Fund size
DFAU $12.9B
WBIL $29M
1Y total return
DFAU +13.2%, better
WBIL +11.0%
Yield (12M)
DFAU 0.90%, better
WBIL 0.04%
Holdings
DFAU 2165
WBIL 52
Avg volume (30D)
DFAU 555K sh, better
WBIL 3.65K sh
NAV per share
DFAU $52.28
WBIL $39.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFAU: Cost 97, Risk 65, Mission 83, Tradability 87, Holdings 84, Durability 91. WBIL: Cost 3, Risk 34, Mission 70, Tradability 57, Holdings 76, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFAU, WBIL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFAUWBIL
Cost30% weightA97HigherF3
Mission25% weightA83HigherA70
Risk15% weightB65HigherD34
Tradability15% weightA87HigherB57
Holdings10% weightA84HigherA76
Durability5% weightA91HigherB55

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFAU and WBIL are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

DFAU ranks 2nd and WBIL 98th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLCAvantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2ADFAUDimensional US Core Equity Market ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3ADFACDimensional US Core Equity 2 ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 98DTEXXHorizon Kinetics Texas ETFScore 33
  5. Rank 98DWBILWBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETFScore 33
  6. Rank 103DPLGIPL Growth and Income ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFAUADimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

WBILDWBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF

In short

DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.

WBIL Most equity funds ride the drop out. WBIL is built to sell into it: nightly quality screens pick the names, a tightening trailing stop decides when they go, and cash counts as a position. An active, risk-managed spin on the Russell 3000 universe, priced accordingly.

Stated mandate

DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.

WBIL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and potential current income while also seeking to protect principal during unfavorable market conditions.

Why people hold it

  • DFAU Charges 0.12% a year, well under the 0.65% median for active US equity funds and the cheapest of the top-graded names in its group (AVLC, DFAC, FELC).
  • Holds roughly 2,400 US companies, so no single name steers the fund. Whole-market coverage, not a concentrated bet.
  • Active without the stock-picking drama: it leans weights toward value, profitability and momentum, using the Russell 3000 as its reference point rather than a rigid rulebook.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the strongest overall implementations in its active US equity peer group.
  • WBIL Stock picks come from nightly screens for quality fundamentals, reasonable value, positive revenue and earnings trends, and price momentum, not index weights.wbietfs.comwbietfs.com 2
  • Every holding gets a price goal and a stop allowance at purchase. The stop tightens as the stock climbs; if it is hit, the position is sold.wbietfs.com
  • Cash is a deliberate output. When the trend models flag risk, the process builds cash instead of staying fully invested.wbietfs.com
  • Running since 2014, from a manager that has used trend models for decades, so the discipline has been through real bear markets.wbishares.com

Worth knowing

  • DFAU Those tilts cut both ways: results can drift from a plain Russell 3000 fund for long stretches, in either direction.
  • No published index behind it. The trade-off for flexibility is that you're buying Dimensional's process, not a public set of rules you can check line by line.
  • Distributions land quarterly, not monthly, and the mandate is long-term capital appreciation rather than income.
  • WBIL At 1.45% a year, this is a premium price tag. Core active rivals like DFAU and FELC charge a small fraction of that.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume mean wider spreads and more price impact on large orders than a mainstream core fund.
  • Selling into weakness cuts both ways: stops can exit just before a rebound, and turnover runs high. Payouts come annually or semiannually, not quarterly.wbietfs.com

Full DFAU profile⁠

Full WBIL profile⁠

DFAU vs WBIL Holdings

How DFAU and WBIL differ

Overlap by weight

9.9%

Shared holdings make up 94.6% of WBIL and 9.9% of DFAU.

Level by level

  • Holdings51 in both9.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors87.8%
  • Countryby domicile99.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in DFAU and WBIL, widest gap first
SectorMore in DFAUMore in WBIL
CommunicationDFAU +6.3 points
IndustrialsWBIL +5.1 points
Health CareWBIL +3.1 points
UtilitiesDFAU +2.1 points
Consumer StaplesDFAU +1.9 points
EnergyWBIL +1.7 points
TechnologyWBIL +1.4 points
FinancialsDFAU +1.1 points
MaterialsWBIL +0.9 points
Consumer DiscretionaryDFAU +0.6 points
Real EstateDFAU +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DFAU and WBIL, widest gap first
CountryMore in DFAUMore in WBIL
ChinaWBIL +0.8 points
Other countries (10)DFAU +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DFAU33.4%
  • WBIL27.2%

Securities held

  • DFAU2,164
  • WBIL51

Asset class

DFAU
Equity
WBIL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DFAU2,113
  • In both51
  • Only in WBIL0

Only in DFAU

2,113 securities, 89.9% of DFAU by weight

  • Apple Inc.7.10%
  • NVIDIA Corp6.79%
  • Microsoft Corp5.62%

Only in WBIL

0 securities, 0.0% of WBIL by weight

Weight gaps

All 51 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in DFAU and WBIL, widest gap first
HoldingMore in DFAUMore in WBIL
Zscaler IncZSWBIL +2.68 points
Gitlab IncGTLBWBIL +2.66 points
Veeva Systems IncVEEVWBIL +2.50 points
Atlassian Corp PLCTEAMWBIL +2.29 points
Williams-Sonoma IncWSMWBIL +2.21 points
Cme Group Inc.CMEWBIL +2.17 points
Cboe Global Markets IncCBOEWBIL +2.16 points
Amgen IncAMGNWBIL +2.13 points

All 2,381 DFAU holdings⁠All 29 WBIL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFAU vs WBIL Cost

Overpaying WBIL vs DFAU

$26,521

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFAU 0.12%

    $2,520

  • WBIL 1.70%

    $29,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFAU 0.12%
  • WBIL 1.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530WBIL $29,041DFAU $2,520

Year by year

YearDFAUWBILOverpaying
10$220$2,911$2,691
20$859$10,606$9,747
30$2,520$29,041$26,521

Expense ratio

  • 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
  • 1.70%WBIL
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds

WBIL 117th cheapest of 121 funds

DFAU vs WBIL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DFAU 0.90%, better
WBIL 0.04%
Payout (12M)
DFAU $0.47
WBIL $0.02
Last payment
DFAU $0.12
WBIL $0.02
Ex-dividend
DFAU Sep 22, 2026
WBIL Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
DFAU Sep 24, 2026
WBIL Dec 19, 2025
Frequency
DFAU Quarterly
WBIL Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

DFAUQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll DFAU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2020 $0.03; Mar 23, 2021 $0.05; Jun 22, 2021 $0.08; Sep 21, 2021 $0.08; Dec 16, 2021 $0.12; Mar 22, 2022 $0.07; Jun 22, 2022 $0.09; Sep 20, 2022 $0.10; Dec 20, 2022 $0.11; Mar 21, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2023 $0.10; Sep 19, 2023 $0.10; Dec 19, 2023 $0.13; Mar 19, 2024 $0.08; Jun 18, 2024 $0.10; Sep 17, 2024 $0.11; Dec 17, 2024 $0.16; Mar 25, 2025 $0.09; Jun 24, 2025 $0.12; Sep 23, 2025 $0.12; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.12; Sep 22, 2026 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
WBILIrregular · 24 paymentsAll WBIL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 14, 2017 $0.04; Jun 27, 2017 $0.10; Sep 19, 2017 $0.04; Dec 28, 2017 $0.04; Mar 13, 2018 $0.04; Jun 26, 2018 $0.09; Sep 18, 2018 $0.05; Dec 28, 2018 $0.04; Mar 12, 2019 $0.06; Jun 25, 2019 $0.05; Sep 17, 2019 $0.03; Dec 30, 2019 $0.07; Mar 17, 2020 $0.02; Sep 15, 2020 $0.02; Dec 29, 2020 $0.008; Mar 16, 2021 $0.03; Sep 27, 2021 $0.08; Dec 29, 2021 $0.51; Sep 28, 2022 $0.05; Dec 28, 2022 $0.23; Mar 29, 2023 $0.08; Dec 27, 2023 $0.01; Jun 27, 2024 $0.03; Dec 18, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

DFAU vs WBIL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DFAU
  • WBIL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: WBIL −25.3% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFAU 12.4%, betterWBIL 14.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFAU 1.38, betterWBIL 0.52
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFAU −23.6%, betterWBIL −25.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFAU 1.01WBIL 1.19

DFAU and WBIL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DFAUAvsAVLCA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WBILDvsAVLCA

    WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAUAvsDFACA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WBILDvsDFACA

    WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAUAvsDYNFA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WBILDvsDYNFA

    WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.