DFAC ranks 3rd and XCHG 44th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAC vs XCHG
DFAC −0.33pt a year
0.17%0.50%
DFAC 1124.0×the volume
2M1.78K
DFAC vs XCHG Performance
+14.0%+8.5%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- XCHG 0.50%
- DFAC $87.6B
- XCHG $705M
- DFAC +15.9%
- XCHG
- DFAC 0.88%
- XCHG
- DFAC 2550
- XCHG 580
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- XCHG 1.78K sh
- DFAC $44.79
- XCHG $27.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAC | XCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A76 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A97Higher | B67 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAC and XCHG are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFACA
XCHGB
In short
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
XCHG The ticker is the tell. XCHG was seeded through a Section 351 exchange, the mechanism for folding appreciated stock into a new fund, then run as an actively managed, S&P 500-benchmarked portfolio of US mid- and large-caps.
Stated mandate
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
XCHG The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and income by investing primarily in U.S. mid- and large-capitalization companies. Its approach combines fundamental and quantitative research and aims to outperform over market cycles.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAC vs XCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAC vs XCHG Cost
Overpaying XCHG vs DFAC
$6,433
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
XCHG 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAC | XCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $900 | $590 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $3,460 | $2,249 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $9,979 | $6,433 |
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- 0.50%XCHG
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
XCHG 45th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC vs XCHG Dividends
- DFAC 0.88%
- XCHG
- DFAC $0.39
- XCHG
- DFAC $0.10
- XCHG $0.04
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- XCHG Sep 18, 2026
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- XCHG Sep 21, 2026
- DFAC Quarterly
- XCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
DFAC vs XCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAC 12.6%XCHG
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAC 1.32XCHG
- Worst fall
- DFAC −23.1%XCHG
- Market sensitivity
- DFAC 0.99XCHG 0.91
DFAC and XCHG in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.