DFAU ranks 2nd and XCHG 44th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAU vs XCHG
DFAU −0.38pt a year
0.12%0.50%
DFAU 311.2×the volume
555K1.78K
DFAU vs XCHG Performance
+12.2%+8.5%
- DFAU 0.12%, better
- XCHG 0.50%
- DFAU $12.8B
- XCHG $705M
- DFAU +12.9%
- XCHG
- DFAU 0.91%
- XCHG
- DFAU 2163
- XCHG 580
- DFAU 555K sh, better
- XCHG 1.78K sh
- DFAU $52.07
- XCHG $27.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAU | XCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A83Higher | A76 |
| Risk | B65Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A91Higher | B67 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAU and XCHG are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFAUA
XCHGB
In short
DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.
XCHG The ticker is the tell. XCHG was seeded through a Section 351 exchange, the mechanism for folding appreciated stock into a new fund, then run as an actively managed, S&P 500-benchmarked portfolio of US mid- and large-caps.
Stated mandate
DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.
XCHG The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and income by investing primarily in U.S. mid- and large-capitalization companies. Its approach combines fundamental and quantitative research and aims to outperform over market cycles.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAU vs XCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAU vs XCHG Cost
Overpaying XCHG vs DFAU
$7,459
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAU 0.12%
$2,520
XCHG 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAU | XCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $900 | $680 |
| 20 | $859 | $3,460 | $2,601 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $9,979 | $7,459 |
- 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
- 0.50%XCHG
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds
XCHG 45th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAU vs XCHG Dividends
- DFAU 0.91%
- XCHG
- DFAU $0.47
- XCHG
- DFAU $0.12
- XCHG $0.04
- DFAU Sep 22, 2026
- XCHG Sep 18, 2026
- DFAU Sep 24, 2026
- XCHG Sep 21, 2026
- DFAU Quarterly
- XCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
DFAU vs XCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAU 12.4%XCHG
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAU 1.38XCHG
- Worst fall
- DFAU −23.6%XCHG
- Market sensitivity
- DFAU 1.01XCHG 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.