Skip to content

DFAU vs XCHG

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

DFAUANYSE Arca

Ab US Equity ETF

XCHGBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

DFAU −0.38pt a year

DFAU0.12%XCHG0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

DFAU 311.2×the volume

DFAU555KXCHG1.78K

DFAU vs XCHG Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+12.2%DFAU+8.5%XCHG

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. DFAU +12.2%. XCHG +8.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DFAU 0.12%, better
XCHG 0.50%
Fund size
DFAU $12.8B
XCHG $705M
1Y total return
DFAU +12.9%
XCHG No data
Yield (12M)
DFAU 0.91%
XCHG No data
Holdings
DFAU 2163
XCHG 580
Avg volume (30D)
DFAU 555K sh, better
XCHG 1.78K sh
NAV per share
DFAU $52.07
XCHG $27.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFAU: Cost 97, Risk 65, Mission 83, Tradability 87, Holdings 84, Durability 91. XCHG: Cost 66, Risk 60, Mission 76, Tradability 40, Holdings 66, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFAU, XCHG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFAUXCHG
Cost30% weightA97HigherB66
Mission25% weightA83HigherA76
Risk15% weightB65HigherB60
Tradability15% weightA87HigherC40
Holdings10% weightA84HigherB66
Durability5% weightA91HigherB67

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFAU and XCHG are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

DFAU ranks 2nd and XCHG 44th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLCAvantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2ADFAUDimensional US Core Equity Market ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3ADFACDimensional US Core Equity 2 ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 44BMIGOMIG Core ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 44BXCHGAb US Equity ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 48BBROLBaron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFAUADimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

XCHGBAb US Equity ETF

In short

DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.

XCHG The ticker is the tell. XCHG was seeded through a Section 351 exchange, the mechanism for folding appreciated stock into a new fund, then run as an actively managed, S&P 500-benchmarked portfolio of US mid- and large-caps.

Stated mandate

DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.

XCHG The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and income by investing primarily in U.S. mid- and large-capitalization companies. Its approach combines fundamental and quantitative research and aims to outperform over market cycles.

Why people hold it

  • DFAU Charges 0.12% a year, well under the 0.65% median for active US equity funds and the cheapest of the top-graded names in its group (AVLC, DFAC, FELC).
  • Holds roughly 2,400 US companies, so no single name steers the fund. Whole-market coverage, not a concentrated bet.
  • Active without the stock-picking drama: it leans weights toward value, profitability and momentum, using the Russell 3000 as its reference point rather than a rigid rulebook.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the strongest overall implementations in its active US equity peer group.
  • XCHG 0.50% a year versus a 0.65% median for active US equity funds. An active mandate at a below-average sticker price.
  • Roughly 600 holdings measured against the S&P 500. A broad core sleeve, not a concentrated bet on a dozen convictions.
  • Built with Bernstein Private Wealth Management and launched into an AB ETF lineup already more than 20 funds deep. Pays quarterly.prnewswire.com
  • The process blends fundamental and quantitative research across US mid- and large-caps, aiming at growth of capital and income over full market cycles.

Worth knowing

  • DFAU Those tilts cut both ways: results can drift from a plain Russell 3000 fund for long stretches, in either direction.
  • No published index behind it. The trade-off for flexibility is that you're buying Dimensional's process, not a public set of rules you can check line by line.
  • Distributions land quarterly, not monthly, and the mandate is long-term capital appreciation rather than income.
  • XCHG Thinly traded. Spreads can run wider than on mega-liquid index funds, and size orders may need more patience.
  • Launched in December 2025, so there is no multi-cycle record for this strategy in ETF form yet.
  • Other active funds benchmarked to the same index charge less, including FELC at 0.18% and PQUS at 0.22%.

Full DFAU profile⁠

Full XCHG profile⁠

DFAU vs XCHG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFAU vs XCHG Cost

Overpaying XCHG vs DFAU

$7,459

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFAU 0.12%

    $2,520

  • XCHG 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFAU 0.12%
  • XCHG 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530XCHG $9,979DFAU $2,520

Year by year

YearDFAUXCHGOverpaying
10$220$900$680
20$859$3,460$2,601
30$2,520$9,979$7,459

Expense ratio

  • 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
  • 0.50%XCHG
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds

XCHG 45th cheapest of 121 funds

DFAU vs XCHG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
DFAU 0.91%
XCHG No data
Payout (12M)
DFAU $0.47
XCHG No data
Last payment
DFAU $0.12
XCHG $0.04
Ex-dividend
DFAU Sep 22, 2026
XCHG Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
DFAU Sep 24, 2026
XCHG Sep 21, 2026
Frequency
DFAU Quarterly
XCHG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

DFAUQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll DFAU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2020 $0.03; Mar 23, 2021 $0.05; Jun 22, 2021 $0.08; Sep 21, 2021 $0.08; Dec 16, 2021 $0.12; Mar 22, 2022 $0.07; Jun 22, 2022 $0.09; Sep 20, 2022 $0.10; Dec 20, 2022 $0.11; Mar 21, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2023 $0.10; Sep 19, 2023 $0.10; Dec 19, 2023 $0.13; Mar 19, 2024 $0.08; Jun 18, 2024 $0.10; Sep 17, 2024 $0.11; Dec 17, 2024 $0.16; Mar 25, 2025 $0.09; Jun 24, 2025 $0.12; Sep 23, 2025 $0.12; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.12; Sep 22, 2026 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.10202020232026YTD
XCHGQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll XCHG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2025 $0.01; Mar 20, 2026 $0.05; Jun 22, 2026 $0.04; Sep 18, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.10202020232026YTD

DFAU vs XCHG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFAU 12.4%XCHG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFAU 1.38XCHG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFAU −23.6%XCHG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFAU 1.01XCHG 0.91

Popular comparisons

  • DFAUAvsAVLCA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCHGBvsAVLCA

    Ab US Equity ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAUAvsDFACA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCHGBvsDFACA

    Ab US Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAUAvsDYNFA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCHGBvsDYNFA

    Ab US Equity ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.