DFAC ranks 3rd and XLSR 53rd of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAC vs XLSR
DFAC −0.53pt a year
0.17%0.70%
DFAC 38.2×the volume
2M52.4K
DFAC +2.5pt
+11.1%+8.6%
DFAC vs XLSR Performance
+69.4%+51.2%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- XLSR 0.70%
- DFAC $87.7B
- XLSR $1.09B
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- XLSR +6.3%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- XLSR 0.41%
- DFAC 2553
- XLSR 22
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- XLSR 52.4K sh
- DFAC $44.87
- XLSR $66.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAC | XLSR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A74 |
| Risk | B66Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A87 | A87 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | D31 |
| Durability | A97Higher | A88 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAC and XLSR are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFACA
XLSRC
In short
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
XLSR Sector timing, outsourced. State Street's Investment Solutions Group tilts toward and away from the S&P 500's GICS sectors using quant signals plus human judgment, typically rebalancing monthly, all inside one US large-cap ticker.
Stated mandate
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
XLSR The fund seeks capital appreciation through active sector rotation. It uses quantitative and qualitative analysis to adjust sector exposures and typically rebalances monthly.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAC vs XLSR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAC vs XLSR Cost
Overpaying XLSR vs DFAC
$10,060
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
XLSR 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAC | XLSR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $1,250 | $940 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $4,760 | $3,549 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $13,606 | $10,060 |
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- 0.70%XLSR
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
XLSR 63rd cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC vs XLSR Dividends
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- XLSR 0.41%
- DFAC $0.39
- XLSR $0.27
- DFAC $0.10
- XLSR $0.06
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- XLSR Sep 25, 2026
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- XLSR Sep 29, 2026
- DFAC Quarterly
- XLSR Quarterly
Distribution history
DFAC vs XLSR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFAC
- XLSR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAC 12.6%XLSR 12.6%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAC 1.32, betterXLSR 1.04
- Worst fall
- DFAC −23.1%, betterXLSR −23.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAC 0.99XLSR 0.97
DFAC and XLSR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

