DFAU ranks 2nd and XLSR 53rd of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAU vs XLSR
DFAU −0.58pt a year
0.12%0.70%
DFAU 10.6×the volume
555K52.4K
DFAU +3.0pt
+11.6%+8.6%
DFAU vs XLSR Performance
+72.9%+51.2%
- DFAU 0.12%, better
- XLSR 0.70%
- DFAU $12.9B
- XLSR $1.09B
- DFAU +13.2%, better
- XLSR +6.3%
- DFAU 0.90%, better
- XLSR 0.41%
- DFAU 2165
- XLSR 22
- DFAU 555K sh, better
- XLSR 52.4K sh
- DFAU $52.28
- XLSR $66.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAU | XLSR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A83Higher | A74 |
| Risk | B65Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A87 | A87 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | D31 |
| Durability | A91Higher | A88 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAU and XLSR are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFAUA
XLSRC
In short
DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.
XLSR Sector timing, outsourced. State Street's Investment Solutions Group tilts toward and away from the S&P 500's GICS sectors using quant signals plus human judgment, typically rebalancing monthly, all inside one US large-cap ticker.
Stated mandate
DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.
XLSR The fund seeks capital appreciation through active sector rotation. It uses quantitative and qualitative analysis to adjust sector exposures and typically rebalances monthly.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAU vs XLSR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAU vs XLSR Cost
Overpaying XLSR vs DFAU
$11,086
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAU 0.12%
$2,520
XLSR 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAU | XLSR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $1,250 | $1,030 |
| 20 | $859 | $4,760 | $3,901 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $13,606 | $11,086 |
- 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
- 0.70%XLSR
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds
XLSR 63rd cheapest of 121 funds
DFAU vs XLSR Dividends
- DFAU 0.90%, better
- XLSR 0.41%
- DFAU $0.47
- XLSR $0.27
- DFAU $0.12
- XLSR $0.06
- DFAU Sep 22, 2026
- XLSR Sep 25, 2026
- DFAU Sep 24, 2026
- XLSR Sep 29, 2026
- DFAU Quarterly
- XLSR Quarterly
Distribution history
DFAU vs XLSR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFAU
- XLSR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAU 12.4%, betterXLSR 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAU 1.38, betterXLSR 1.04
- Worst fall
- DFAU −23.6%XLSR −23.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DFAU 1.01XLSR 0.97
DFAU and XLSR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
