DFAU ranks 2nd and MODL 16th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAU vs MODL
DFAU −0.34pt a year
0.12%0.46%
DFAU 11.3×the volume
555K49.2K
DFAU +0.5pt
+21.6%+21.1%
DFAU vs MODL Performance
+12.9%+10.2%
- DFAU 0.12%, better
- MODL 0.46%
- DFAU $12.8B
- MODL $1.07B
- DFAU +12.9%, better
- MODL +10.2%
- DFAU 0.91%, better
- MODL 0.69%
- DFAU 2163
- MODL 361
- DFAU 555K sh, better
- MODL 49.2K sh
- DFAU $52.07
- MODL $51.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAU | MODL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B65 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A87Higher | A78 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | A78 |
| Durability | A91Higher | A77 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAU and MODL are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFAUA
MODLA
In short
DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.
MODL Most active US equity funds argue about stocks. MODL argues about sectors: WestEnd's macro team owns four to six economic sectors at a time, names the ones it won't touch, and caps any single sector at 35% at purchase.
Stated mandate
DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.
MODL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAU vs MODL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAU vs MODL Cost
Overpaying MODL vs DFAU
$6,710
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAU 0.12%
$2,520
MODL 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAU | MODL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $830 | $610 |
| 20 | $859 | $3,195 | $2,336 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $9,230 | $6,710 |
- 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
- 0.46%MODL
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds
MODL 37th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAU vs MODL Dividends
- DFAU 0.91%, better
- MODL 0.69%
- DFAU $0.47
- MODL $0.36
- DFAU $0.12
- MODL $0.02
- DFAU Sep 22, 2026
- MODL Oct 8, 2026
- DFAU Sep 24, 2026
- MODL Oct 9, 2026
- DFAU Quarterly
- MODL Monthly
Distribution history
DFAU vs MODL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAU 12.4%MODL 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAU 1.38MODL 1.40, better
- Worst fall
- DFAU −23.6%MODL −17.6%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAU 1.01MODL 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.