DFIV ranks 1st and ICOW 9th of 12 funds in the International Value Index Category.
DFIV vs ICOW
DFIV −0.38pt a year
0.27%0.65%
DFIV 9.5×the volume
1.29M135K
DFIV +4.0pt
+15.2%+11.2%
DFIV vs ICOW Performance
+103.0%+69.7%
- DFIV 0.27%, better
- ICOW 0.65%
- DFIV $22B
- ICOW $1.76B
- DFIV +25.3%, better
- ICOW +20.9%
- DFIV 2.73%
- ICOW 3.96%, better
- DFIV 646
- ICOW 106
- DFIV 1.29M sh, better
- ICOW 135K sh
- DFIV $55.63
- ICOW $42.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFIV | ICOW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A88 | A88 |
| Risk | B63Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D39 |
| Durability | A79Higher | C53 |
Rank among International Value Index funds
Same Category. DFIV and ICOW are both graded against the same 12 International Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFIVA
ICOWC
In short
DFIV A 1999-vintage Dimensional tax-managed strategy that swapped its mutual fund wrapper for an ETF in 2021. It buys cheap large-cap stocks across developed markets outside the US, with tax minimization written into the objective itself.
ICOW Cash flow is the yardstick here, not book value. ICOW screens the FTSE Developed ex-US index and holds the 100 companies with the highest free-cash-flow yield: international value measured by money that actually landed.
Stated mandate
DFIV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation while minimizing federal income taxes on returns.
ICOW The fund seeks capital appreciation through a rules-based screen of the FTSE Developed ex-US Index that selects 100 international companies based on free-cash-flow yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFIV vs ICOW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFIV vs ICOW Cost
Overpaying ICOW vs DFIV
$7,160
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFIV 0.27%
$5,557
ICOW 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFIV | ICOW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $491 | $1,163 | $672 |
| 20 | $1,907 | $4,440 | $2,533 |
| 30 | $5,557 | $12,717 | $7,160 |
- 0.27%DFIV, cheaper
- 0.65%ICOW
- Middle half of International Value Index funds
- Median 0.31%
DFIV 4th cheapest of 12 funds
ICOW 12th cheapest of 12 funds
DFIV vs ICOW Dividends
- DFIV 2.73%
- ICOW 3.96%, better
- DFIV $1.56
- ICOW $1.73
- DFIV $0.28
- ICOW $0.94
- DFIV Sep 22, 2026
- ICOW Sep 3, 2026
- DFIV Sep 24, 2026
- ICOW Sep 8, 2026
- DFIV Quarterly
- ICOW Quarterly
Distribution history
DFIV vs ICOW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFIV
- ICOW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFIV 11.4%, betterICOW 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFIV 1.72, betterICOW 1.06
- Worst fall
- DFIV −25.4%, betterICOW −27.8%
- Market sensitivity
- DFIV 0.80ICOW 0.75
DFIV and ICOW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.27% · 0.31%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.31%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
