DFLV ranks 4th and GSPY 32nd of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs GSPY
DFLV −0.29pt a year
0.21%0.50%
DFLV 131.6×the volume
658K5K
GSPY +0.8pt
+22.7%+23.5%
DFLV vs GSPY Performance
+29.3%+14.9%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- GSPY 0.50%
- DFLV $7.39B
- GSPY $704M
- DFLV +29.3%, better
- GSPY +14.9%
- DFLV 1.35%
- GSPY 2.30%, better
- DFLV 336
- GSPY 501
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- GSPY 5K sh
- DFLV $41.80
- GSPY $41.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | GSPY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | B57 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | A76Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | C46 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B67 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and GSPY are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
GSPYC
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
GSPY Same 500 companies as the index, reshuffled. This active fund lets the sub-adviser's valuation work set position sizes instead of market cap, so the biggest company doesn't automatically get the biggest slot.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
GSPY The actively managed fund generally invests in companies included in the S&P 500 Index and weights them using the sub-adviser’s valuation assessment rather than passively tracking the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs GSPY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs GSPY Cost
Overpaying GSPY vs DFLV
$5,622
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
GSPY 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | GSPY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $900 | $517 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $3,460 | $1,969 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $9,979 | $5,622 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.50%GSPY
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
GSPY 26th cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs GSPY Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%
- GSPY 2.30%, better
- DFLV $0.57
- GSPY $0.96
- DFLV $0.16
- GSPY $0.96
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- GSPY Dec 10, 2025
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- GSPY Dec 11, 2025
- DFLV Quarterly
- GSPY Annual
Distribution history
DFLV vs GSPY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%GSPY 12.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38GSPY 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%GSPY −23.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80GSPY 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.